All your media companies are fucked
Jan. 9th, 2009 09:37 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
andrewduckerI was chatting to ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
cairmen the other day about movie companies, and he was telling me that there's a major problem with the US movie industry - too many movies are being produced. And the problem isn't that so many of them are shit - it's that there's just no way to market that many movies, nor are there enough cinema slots to show them.
Way back at the dawn of time media was local - you'd produce entertainment for the people in your village (and usually for free). A global market has the problem that you can produce media for 6 billion people with a few thousand producers. If everyone produces media then you end up with so much media that everyone takes home a tiny slice of the pie, or even no pie. This is fine* if the entry costs into the market are massive - as companies go bust they won't be replaced, because nobody can afford to make that kind of risk, and eventually you end up with a few media conglomerates controlling everything, and they can all make a profit. When the barriers to entry are low enough that amateurs can make their own Star Trek episodes that actually look better than the original series - well, nobody is making money out of that.
Even worse, people are happy to produce lots of this stuff for free! Over here** you will find an infinite page of pictures scraped from 4chan. They're a mixture of photos, photoshops and art. Many of them are not safe for work, and an awful lot of them are anime-based. But that's not really the point - the point is that a hell of a lot of them are fucking impressive. Some of the people making them are incredibly talented. And they're making things and giving them away because they want to.
If you have ever had any interest in working in an industry where people are paid for producing art then you might find this a little scary.
Of course, none of this is new. But it does seem to be getting bigger. And you have to wonder what bits of industry will end up able to make money in the long run - and what niches they will be in.
*Clearly I'm using the word "fine" here in a very limited sense.
**Cheers tojohnbobshaun for the link. I has new wallpaper.
cairmen the other day about movie companies, and he was telling me that there's a major problem with the US movie industry - too many movies are being produced. And the problem isn't that so many of them are shit - it's that there's just no way to market that many movies, nor are there enough cinema slots to show them. Way back at the dawn of time media was local - you'd produce entertainment for the people in your village (and usually for free). A global market has the problem that you can produce media for 6 billion people with a few thousand producers. If everyone produces media then you end up with so much media that everyone takes home a tiny slice of the pie, or even no pie. This is fine* if the entry costs into the market are massive - as companies go bust they won't be replaced, because nobody can afford to make that kind of risk, and eventually you end up with a few media conglomerates controlling everything, and they can all make a profit. When the barriers to entry are low enough that amateurs can make their own Star Trek episodes that actually look better than the original series - well, nobody is making money out of that.
Even worse, people are happy to produce lots of this stuff for free! Over here** you will find an infinite page of pictures scraped from 4chan. They're a mixture of photos, photoshops and art. Many of them are not safe for work, and an awful lot of them are anime-based. But that's not really the point - the point is that a hell of a lot of them are fucking impressive. Some of the people making them are incredibly talented. And they're making things and giving them away because they want to.
If you have ever had any interest in working in an industry where people are paid for producing art then you might find this a little scary.
Of course, none of this is new. But it does seem to be getting bigger. And you have to wonder what bits of industry will end up able to make money in the long run - and what niches they will be in.
*Clearly I'm using the word "fine" here in a very limited sense.
**Cheers to
johnbobshaun for the link. I has new wallpaper.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-01-09 10:38 pm (UTC)http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:pzurAqojz3UJ:ritim.cba.uri.edu/wp2003/pdf_format/Wiley-Encycl-Internet-Usage-Gender-Final.pdf+internet+stats+gender&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=uk&client=firefox-a
Also check yer chauvanism in at the door ;)
http://nms.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/3/4/395
In the United States and Australia, men and women use the internet in nearly equal measure, whereas in Japan, India and China, men continue to dominate internet use.
I wouldn't be suprised if for many nations where internet use has not reached 48% penetration that women use the internet less then men.
http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/cpb.2005.8.371
We found a number of gender differences in participants' use of the Internet. Males were proportionally more likely to have their own web page than were females. They used the Internet more than females; in particular, they were more likely to use game websites, to use other specialist websites, and to download material from the Internet. However, females did not use the Internet for communication more than males.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-10 02:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-10 09:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-10 10:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-10 10:50 am (UTC)But the higher the percentage of the population that use the internet the higher the chance the gender split will approach 50/50 (Or whatever the gender split happens to be in Europe).
IE. the bigger the sample the more represntitive of the population it will be. But thanks for the non-sequiter ;)