andrewducker: (headshot)
[personal profile] andrewducker
I see people all the time who are just as pretty as movie stars.  I see them in the street.  I see them in restaurants, shops, offices, parks and houses.

People in movies are, to be fair, generally not ugly.  They tend not to be obese, or to have horrible birthmarks, or to look like they were hit in the face with the ugly stick.

But it's easy to forget that when you see a famous person on TV or in a movie, they've had several people work on them to make them look gorgeous, and they then get shot from nice directions with great lighting.

This is even more true when it comes to photos.  There's a retouching site here that I hadn't seen before - where you can see photos which have appeared in various places, and then see how that person actually looks.  And realise, that actually, while these people aren't _ugly_, they don't look as good as their official image.

I wonder how it feels to have everyone think you don't look as good as they thought you did.

You can see why people disassociate from their public personas.  They aren't who they are, they just play themselves on TV.

Date: 2005-08-26 10:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lilitufire.livejournal.com
Wow. There's some quite fake looking ones, and some seriously impressive ones. I only clicked on a few, but he took a good 15 years off one girl. I was impressed by changing the angle of the foot in one photo too.

I am glad these impossible creatures also have back fat, protruding veins and other such normalities.

Date: 2005-08-26 11:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redshira.livejournal.com
Most of them don't even need retouching! Some of them looked better beforehand, IMO. I was clicking through going "What's wrong with that?!"

Date: 2005-08-26 11:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] laserboy.livejournal.com
A quick glance at any of the american news channels is a scary experience. I've never seen so many generically 'pretty' people before, with perfect teeth, hair, clothes.... So boring.

Date: 2005-08-26 12:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] channelpenguin.livejournal.com
The 'after' shots all look more like CGI than reality! I genuinely do prefer the 'untouched' ones in all cases.

I've noticed the increasing 'plastic doll' look of women on covers of magazines over the past few years and find it most odd. It is strangely comforting, though, when it gets as blatant as it has - when the images are that obviously artificial, you don't bother comparing yourself. (OK, so I'm vain!)

Date: 2005-08-27 11:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dapperscavenger.livejournal.com
Bwahahaha! I love the hairy armpit on one of the girls. If I knew I was gonna get all retouched, I'm not sure I'd bother either.

September 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 4 5 6
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 6th, 2025 12:28 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios