I loathe people
Jul. 23rd, 2005 01:44 pmHere is a piece on two (popular) girls who carried out a simple psychology experiment. One of them dressed up as a goth and then they both went for job interviews in local stores. They padded the resume of the one who was dressed up more gothily, while the other claimed to have no retail experience at all.
Can you guess which one got all the interviews?

This seems to be worse in the US than over here in the UK - where you _do_ get some negative responses, but they seem to be lower level. On the other hand, there seems to be a fair bit more of it about over here - there were pretty-much no goths in Stirling when I arrived there 10 years ago, and now there's a definite contingent of people who at least _look_ that way.
I despise the treatment of people by looks (with the obvious exceptions of people wearing "I love the Conservative Party" t-shirts and other indicators of incipient dangerousness), and the recent trend towards a certain level of casualness has been great. I'd be very happy to never have to wear a tie ever again - the focus on them strikes me as a peculiar cultural madness and makes no sense to me whatsoever - I really might as well be required to wear a sash or a belt to show my business-worthiness.
(cheers to
bradhicks for the link)
Can you guess which one got all the interviews?

On the way there, Nichols walked with her boyfriend Cameron Newton, 17. Newton, decked out in his varsity jacket and looking like Joe All-American, caught more than few puzzled looks with goth-Nichols at his side.
"It was bad," he acknowledged.
Nichols says people were obviously rude to her, with two women passing the couple and one commenting, "What is HE doing with HER?"
The ebullient Nichols says she passed a woman pushing a stroller with a toddler beside her. As she often does, Nichols leaned close to the stroller and gushed about the cute baby inside.
"Nothing like this has ever happened to me before," Nichols says. "She literally shoved the toddler behind her and rushed away like I was a dangerous person."
This seems to be worse in the US than over here in the UK - where you _do_ get some negative responses, but they seem to be lower level. On the other hand, there seems to be a fair bit more of it about over here - there were pretty-much no goths in Stirling when I arrived there 10 years ago, and now there's a definite contingent of people who at least _look_ that way.
I despise the treatment of people by looks (with the obvious exceptions of people wearing "I love the Conservative Party" t-shirts and other indicators of incipient dangerousness), and the recent trend towards a certain level of casualness has been great. I'd be very happy to never have to wear a tie ever again - the focus on them strikes me as a peculiar cultural madness and makes no sense to me whatsoever - I really might as well be required to wear a sash or a belt to show my business-worthiness.
(cheers to
no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 01:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 02:07 pm (UTC)What, on the basis of one experiment? :?
no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 02:37 pm (UTC)To be fair, I suspect that it's worse outside of cities and the US has huge swathes of area which fall into that category. Being a goth in NY is probably fairly easy - being so in smalltown Ohio is undoubtably going to be harder.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-27 08:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 02:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 02:52 pm (UTC)I was more aghast at the way she was treated openly as she walked down the street...
no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 02:53 pm (UTC)Though I admit, if the treatment on the streets is as bad as they say, I would disagree with it. I did my fare share of wandering around in gothy clothes, though, and don't think I terrified any mothers, but I have to admit, it was usually in a more appropriate time and place than local malls.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 03:00 pm (UTC)This concept totally fails to work for me,
no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 03:19 pm (UTC)Myself, as well. Yes, if you're wearing clothing that is meant to provoke, you should expect reactions. I grew up as a Black Man in the Deep South, and I can tell you a great deal about "reactions".
And first and foremost is that sterotyping is no excuse for rudeness. None.
Andrew -- may I repost? And did you notice the last paragraph, where the girls recounted "what they learned from this"?
no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 03:25 pm (UTC)And I agree - walking down the street with a t-shirt that says "Jesus Fucks Babies" is _asking_ for a response, so you shoukd expect one.
But as neither of them were wearing anything like that, the reactions seemed remarkably over the top.
And ofcourse you can repost. I stole it in the first place, and it's from a public news story.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 03:35 pm (UTC)Thinking about it carefully, I'd say that it happens at -least- 75% of the occasions that I go out, probably more. It used to be more than that.
If I'm -speaking- out loud in public, then there's the racist (for want of a better word) remarks, but that's to be expected, since that's not seen as racism here.
They've tightened up the dress code where I work from smart casual to "business casual" and put in specific restrictions about clothing types/lengths/styles since people were openly abusing it.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 04:25 pm (UTC)Good Lord. I had one comment 10 days ago (in Guildford, someone drunk on a bench with a mate told me to get a haircut), but other than that, and the odd comment from kids in the street outside my flat (about once a month) I haven't had any comments in months.
I'm somewhat amazed.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 04:43 pm (UTC)And you often have your nose deep in a book so are somewhat oblivious ;-)
no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 04:46 pm (UTC)It stopped happening (much) at some point when I was in Stirling. I've never quite managed to pin down when or why.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 06:47 pm (UTC)I consider it all part and parcel of looking the way I do though, small town narrow-mindedness etc
no subject
Date: 2005-07-27 08:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 05:00 pm (UTC)But yes, no more crop tops, skirts above mid-thigh and flip flops. It was getting a tad silly at times, in certain parts of the building...
no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 05:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 05:13 pm (UTC)It was a bit distracting :)
no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 05:30 pm (UTC)No.
Never.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 04:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 04:14 pm (UTC)The other one I would not employ because I have a deep-seated and irrational prejudice against women who carry those stupid little handbags. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 04:49 pm (UTC)I don't think it's unreasonable for a retail store to expect its employees to conform to a specific dress code *on the job* if they're customer facing. Expecting that she wouldn't do that and basically cold shouldering her out on the basis of her (assumed) personal style is out of order, however.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 04:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 05:46 pm (UTC)Although, discrimination based on clothing seems somewhat justifiable. You choose your clothing, after all.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 05:56 pm (UTC)Depends on the clothing. Discrimination should only take place based on things that are rationally connected. If people who wore black _were_ far more likely to steal babies and kill old ladies then yes. But being rude to people based on disliking a particular clothing combination seems to me to be the height of bad manners.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 06:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 06:52 pm (UTC)I think it all boils down to a simple fear of what they dont understand - and then collecting information to confirm and justify that fear, so they can justify to themselves the behaviour they engage in as a result of that fear.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 11:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-23 11:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-24 04:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-24 03:55 pm (UTC)Deirdra, who is not goth, but has fashion sense.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-24 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-25 01:13 pm (UTC)That's a hell of a way to start a stressful work week! Thank you!
no subject
Date: 2005-07-24 11:06 am (UTC)FWIW if I was an employer I wouldn't have hired Goth Girl for anything. No matter what her personal lifestyle choices are, if you come to a job interview dressed like that, it not so subtly says "I don't give a shit about your job, and your corporate needs, I just want to be me." You don't need to wear a suit to interview for McDonalds but neutral clothing - vanilla if you like - is always appropriate. Jeans and a clean t shirt would do. And yes that is the clothing of the dominant tribe not your fill-in-the-gap subculture - live with it. Goth Girl might get a job in advertising maybe, or a bar (a job where unusually sexuality in women is usuall seen as appropriate), dressed like that but not anywhere else..
no subject
Date: 2005-07-24 12:13 pm (UTC)Even then, I think your employer buys your (precious) time. If they want more than that then they should offer more. They don't though. I work in an office where nobody ever sees me, yet I cannot wear shorts in the height of Summer because of their dress code. Andrew wears a tie, how does that help him in his job exactly?
no subject
Date: 2005-07-24 03:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-24 10:37 am (UTC)In my experience, I've been looked down at when I've been at concerts, or in 'Goth' clubs, because I don't were anything like Goth or metal clothing. But I like the MUSIC at these venues. Similarly, if you dress all in black leather, and have piercing, it doesn't automatically mean you like devil-worshipping music. For me, it's the automatic assumption that the clothes you wear depict your tastes that pisses me off. There's no correlation.
Though I do find it funny, again in my experience, that the 'Goth-type' who is so paranoid about being singled out for the way they look, would generally look down on me when I tell them I'm listening to something like Sisters Of Mercy. Like "Who do you think you are, listening to the Sisters in your Hugo Boss shirt?" Again, not all the time - but it's been a common, and amusing, experience of mine.
To me, most people dress to belong to the particular social group they want to be a part of. Preppies dress to be with other preppies, Goths dress to be with other Goths, and so on. Most people have some kind of 'uniform' - it's the very definition of the word. You won't find many people attending an Oasis concert, or a Britney one, or a Cure one, who aren't in 'uniform'.
Which is why I like to wear jeans/white t-shirt. That hasn't been 'in' since 90210 was on the tee-vee.... ;+)
no subject
Date: 2005-07-24 03:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-24 03:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-24 04:00 pm (UTC)I'm 30something, but that doesn't make me automatically BORING.
The kicker? One of the companies who told me this had a Core Values and Beliefs statement that said "Being a good business person does not mean being stuffy and boring."
I suppose this applied to no ties (or shoes) for the CEO, but not for wearing stripey tights with a dark dress for me.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-28 07:28 am (UTC)Still, interesting article...