Interesting Links for 19-11-2023
Nov. 19th, 2023 12:00 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
- 1. The UK's economic assessment for vaccination eligibility is a masterpiece of fraud. (We bought the vaccines and then didn't give them to people it would have helped, even though it would also have helped others!)
- (tags:vaccination UK OhForFucksSake )
- 2. Pharmacies prescribing the contraceptive pill will put women's mental health at risk
- (tags:depression hormones women mentalhealth contraception )
- 3. Russell T Davies on the portrayal of disabled people (and facial scarring) and why they decided to change Davros
- (tags:disability drwho evil TV society )
- 4. Evil Cripple - TV Tropes
- (tags:disabilities society tropes TV )
no subject
Date: 2023-11-19 12:18 pm (UTC)The clickbaity "pharmacies putting women's mental health at risk" piece is an op-ed by a lifestyle journalist; there's no new research feeding it, it's alarmist in tone, and while her personal blog didn't ding my "danger: evangelical!" bell, it didn't not ding it. (Women on the pill don't get offered routine mental health check-ups anyway, whether prescribed by their GP or a pharmacist, so this comes over as an anti-contraception hit piece on some level, whether intended by the author or by the editors.)
no subject
Date: 2023-11-19 12:22 pm (UTC)I do agree with her that we *should* be monitoring people's mental health when giving them things that can affect it. I agree with you that we don't do enough of it already.
no subject
Date: 2023-11-19 01:11 pm (UTC)Pharmacists prescribing contraceptive pills was a live issue back when I was a pharmacist, in the second half of the 1980s. This stuff moves slowly.
(There's a very clear trend among American anti-abortion campaigners to extend their opposition to cover the morning after pill, and then hormonal contraception in general, and finally all forms of birth control. I'd be very cautious about taking any stories about contraception side effects at face value in the current media climate unless they're backed up by a peer-reviewed source, and even then I'd want to dig into the authors' funding and association.)
no subject
Date: 2023-11-19 02:22 pm (UTC)(And I know enough people whose mental health was fucked up by hormonal contraception despite assurances from GPs that there are no side effects to them, that I would view any arguments against that as not listening to women.)
no subject
Date: 2023-11-19 01:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-11-19 02:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-11-19 02:23 pm (UTC)And I don't disagree with that either. I think it would be good both for the system to scaffold (with what money?) and for women to know more about this (albeit that this too has a shadow side).
no subject
Date: 2023-11-19 12:20 pm (UTC)One of my friends noticed the side effect of depression long ago, and found that zinc solves it, but apparently zinc has its own problems.
Pharmacies prescribing the contraceptive pill will put women's mental health at risk
Date: 2023-11-19 01:10 pm (UTC)I think the author is 100% right that indiscriminately recommending the contraception pill is a problem and the medical system doesn't acknowledge the problems a lot of people have.
But I think the current system amounts to "the GP will basically prescribe it to anyone without really having time to address any potential problems". The pill is sufficiently well known that just saying "anyone who wants it can just use it, anyone who doesn't want to", seems like it will basically work equally well, since seeing a GP doesn't really provide any extra safety.
I agree that it would be good if we DID have doctors checking in on people whether they have any of these problems (but could equally well be at a regular checkup for "anything that bothers most people"). But we don't. We have three choices: the current system with none of the benefit AND waste a lot of GP time rubber stamping prescriptions; allowing people more choice to choose for themselves which is currently proposed; or forcing people to go through a charade of pretending that the GP will have time to think about this and hoping that it will get sufficiently bad that we will fix the medical system and give GPs more time to pay attention to each patient individually.
I would like more resources for GPs!! I would like anything that helps with that. But that's being voted on. And I don't think gatekeeping the contraceptive pill will make that any more likely, so there's no benefit to doing it. (Unless the bad effects are so prevalent that MOST people should avoid it, which I think we don't have evidence of yet.)
I am conflicted because I think some of the push to "let pharmacies do this" comes from the current government trying to patch over the parts of the system that are systematically under-resourced, and that that does have problems of "this would be ok in theory but it's going to lead to this treatment being taken less seriously" for some of the things. But in cases where I think people could mostly choose for themselves equally well, I don't see any reason to prevent it.
no subject
Date: 2023-11-19 01:31 pm (UTC)Or are they available over the counter ?
Pharmacies dispense three sorts of medicine: the ones you can take from the shelf for the teenager on the counter to sell you; the ones behind the pharmacist that they may sell you after you answer some questions; and those for which you need a prescription from a doctor.
I presume that the contraceptive pill is moving from 3 to 2.
If you choose not to talk to the pharmacist in the consulting booth, it would be a literal over-the-counter transaction, but so is handing in a paper prescription and getting a box of pills. So take "over-the-counter" means just 1.
Pharmacists are pretty hot on side effects; my GP surgery has one (or more) to review my medicines every year, rather than have the GP do it.
no subject
Date: 2023-11-19 04:13 pm (UTC)(Friend is a community pharmacist in an area where the demographic means a solid third of his work day is spent phoning GPs and going "I am not filling this script, it cannot be prescribed with X Y and Z! Can you not read?!")
no subject
Date: 2023-11-19 01:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-11-19 03:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-11-19 04:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-11-19 06:39 pm (UTC)Haven't we had this conversation before? I thought we'd agreed that the answer wasn't to get rid of the minorities we do have, but to add more with a broader range of portrayals?
no subject
Date: 2023-11-19 06:43 pm (UTC)But I can understand that when pretty much every equivalent in Doctor Who has been evil that if there's an easy way to change that then it's not a bad thing to do.
(I believe we had a positive example in Good Omens season 2)
no subject
Date: 2023-11-19 07:00 pm (UTC)I guess I hope they don't *stop* here, in trying to remedy the problem.
no subject
Date: 2023-11-29 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-11-19 06:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-11-19 08:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-11-19 10:30 pm (UTC)