I bumped into a discussion of how much streaming music pays, and thought I'd take a look at the numbers, to try and understand better where the issue is.
Spotify is £11/month. 70% of that goes to the labels, which is £7.70.
If you listen to about 4 hours of music per day* then that's about 60 songs/day, that's about 1800 streams/month. Which would work out to £0.0042 (or 0.42p) per stream**. Which is what they pay.
So if you want to pay more per stream to artists then you need to be paying more to Spotify each month. I did spend more than £11/month on music for most of my 20s. But I'd dropped down to about 2 albums/year by the time Spotify appeared, so I actually started spendig a lot more on music when it came along than I had before.
And, of course, £11/month isn't what it was when Spotify first appeared, the monthly streaming cost has gone up by £1 over the last 15 years. If it had matched inflation then it would be £15/month (or about 0.6p/stream to the artists).
*Clearly chosen to make the figures work. But doesn't seem unreasonable - I probably only listen to a couple of hours a day at the moment, but have listened to up to 12 hours a day at other times in my life, between having it on in the background at home and having headphones on all day.
**If you're wondering, the split of that 0.4p that goes to the artist, rather than the label is....about 15% on a major label. 50% on an indie label, but you obviously get a lot less marketing there, and no advance.
Spotify is £11/month. 70% of that goes to the labels, which is £7.70.
If you listen to about 4 hours of music per day* then that's about 60 songs/day, that's about 1800 streams/month. Which would work out to £0.0042 (or 0.42p) per stream**. Which is what they pay.
So if you want to pay more per stream to artists then you need to be paying more to Spotify each month. I did spend more than £11/month on music for most of my 20s. But I'd dropped down to about 2 albums/year by the time Spotify appeared, so I actually started spendig a lot more on music when it came along than I had before.
And, of course, £11/month isn't what it was when Spotify first appeared, the monthly streaming cost has gone up by £1 over the last 15 years. If it had matched inflation then it would be £15/month (or about 0.6p/stream to the artists).
*Clearly chosen to make the figures work. But doesn't seem unreasonable - I probably only listen to a couple of hours a day at the moment, but have listened to up to 12 hours a day at other times in my life, between having it on in the background at home and having headphones on all day.
**If you're wondering, the split of that 0.4p that goes to the artist, rather than the label is....about 15% on a major label. 50% on an indie label, but you obviously get a lot less marketing there, and no advance.
no subject
Date: 2023-10-17 09:21 am (UTC)Or, if you were performing, something like £10 a ticket, 25% to the performers, so £2.50 per ticket to the band. Requires 20,000 tickets sold a year. At, say 200 per concert, is 100 nights of performing a year to make £50k each a year.
no subject
Date: 2023-10-17 09:48 am (UTC)Similarly with writers, of course: https://publishingperspectives.com/2014/01/how-much-do-writers-earn-less-than-you-think/ (Although they don't tend to make any money at all live or from merchandising).
no subject
Date: 2023-10-17 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-10-17 03:36 pm (UTC)I took a quick look at some albums here: https://routenote.com/blog/music-now-in-the-public-domain-from-1st-january-2022/ and couldn't find any of the albums on Spotify.
no subject
Date: 2023-10-17 12:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-10-17 03:16 pm (UTC)I've no idea what the actual split of ticket sales between venue and and might be almost all of the professional musicians I know are also working other music related jobs on top of performing which makes me think that I'm not a million miles, or a million quid, off.
no subject
Date: 2023-10-17 04:02 pm (UTC)And, if I remember well, Spotify is one of the companies which pay artists the lowest amount (not that the other ones do much better...).
no subject
Date: 2023-10-17 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-10-17 04:06 pm (UTC)nods
no subject
Date: 2023-10-18 08:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-10-18 08:41 am (UTC)Checking market share, the only surprising one to me is Pandora, who I had no idea were still around.
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/top-online-music-services-us/
no subject
Date: 2023-10-17 06:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-10-18 08:44 am (UTC)Which is the equivalent of 3,571 streams. For an audience of millions.
Doesn't sound like they pay more than streaming.
no subject
Date: 2023-10-18 10:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-10-18 10:27 am (UTC)If you meant something else by it, then please show your maths, or otherwise explain what you mean by "pay much worse than radio".
no subject
Date: 2023-10-18 10:41 am (UTC)The vast majority of musicians throughout history have ALWAYS needed pupils, patrons or day jobs. That, I think, is undisputed and speaks for itself.
I refuse to deal with Spotify, and anything I read about the opinions and wishes of its top management only hardens that attitude.
As was said, nearly nobody makes a living from streaming. That's not in doubt. It might not be as common knowledge as I think it ought to be, but that's a detail I guess.
no subject
Date: 2023-10-18 10:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-10-18 10:55 am (UTC)https://twostorymelody.com/how-do-musicians-make-money/
The 'most lucrative' part is the most interesting.
I think we broadly agree.
no subject
Date: 2023-10-18 11:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2023-10-18 12:44 pm (UTC)Good point!