Date: 2022-07-27 04:06 am (UTC)
foms: (Default)
From: [personal profile] foms
I was pleased but surprised that there was section about environmental impacts.

My initial reaction is that it seems a bit optimistic, in the context of species and habitat protection rules (at least my impression of them, where I live, in Canada). Then again, while they have teeth, sufficient political will or money seems to get around them.

Smaller footprint hydroelectric generation is clearly better than larger. I'm also watching other energy storage ideas.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 2324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 24th, 2025 01:59 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios