![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Dammit, I'm going to have to re-read Number of the Beast. I didn't like it the first time I read it, and subsequent re-readings have never endeared it to me, but I think that this perspective on it might well make it worth reading again (much like later examination persuaded me that Total Recall was actually a good film, once I spotted the twist).
Dammit, dammit, dammit. I wonder where my copy is.
If you're bemused by the mild porn and physical references being thrust in your face, you never notice what's actually going on ... all the way through the book, you see lecture after lecture about Who's In Charge, Why Is This Happening, These Are Books We Really Liked, and This Is Why ... and every single time there's a boring lecture or tedious character interaction going on in the foreground, there's an example of how to do it RIGHT in the background ... and constant harping and lecturing on the shoddiness of writers who don't generate stories that *flow*, but just jerk characters and events around with no rhyme or reason ... AND EVERY TIME THAT HAPPENS, A 'BLACK HAT' POPS IN AND JERKS THINGS AROUND ... and EVERY SINGLE 'BLACK HAT' HAS A NAME WHICH IS AN ANAGRAM OF HEINLEIN'S OWN. (Or of someone very close to him.)
Dammit, dammit, dammit. I wonder where my copy is.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-06 11:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-06 11:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-06 12:45 pm (UTC)Which twist? Was it the one about everything after the simulation starts being a simulation (which didn't make sense in some ways) or something else?
no subject
Date: 2003-09-06 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-07 02:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-07 03:36 am (UTC)