Reality

Jul. 17th, 2003 04:52 pm
andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker
Trying again, because the previous wording was causing problems.

[Poll #157777]

Edit: I'd be interested in justifications for (3) from anyone that voted that way.

Re:

Date: 2003-07-21 01:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kpollock.livejournal.com
Not as far as I understand quantum theory. IIRC, you are on about the Copenhagen Interpretation? It's only one of the options, which wax and wane in popularity. There are other explanations of quantum phenonema and even those that require a collapse of the wave function don't always require an 'observer'. Of course one could argue about what counts as an 'observer'.

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 1 23456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 3rd, 2025 03:15 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios