Active Entries
- 1: Interesting Links for 21-04-2025
- 2: Interesting Links for 22-04-2025
- 3: Interesting Links for 20-04-2025
- 4: Photo cross-post
- 5: Interesting Links for 18-04-2025
- 6: A thought about the transgender court case - and the ECHR
- 7: Interesting Links for 19-04-2025
- 8: Review: Planet of Lana
- 9: A brief summary of the Transgender/Equality Act court case
- 10: A thing I wish Google Maps could do
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2012-11-17 02:16 am (UTC)The problem is that the article that provoked this question is kinda [...] mostly saying "Woe! All methods of assuring the computer you are who you say you are can be faked in some way! Dooooom!" and kinda heads off towards the idea that before you can log onto your computer you'll need to juggle balls in front of the webcam[1] and then give it a skin-sample[2].
Actually, retina scanning or thumbprint recognition would be ideal. Any other way can be tampered with, stolen, faked, duped or...so I'm entirely sympathetic to Wired's tone. Passwords are a relic of the good ol' DOS days. Command line shit. What people did waaaaaaaaaaaaaay back in the day when the only way to tell a website or computer you were you was through a special seekret text string of some sort. Text. String. We've moved way beyond computers that can handle text alone and way beyond computers that only have 16KB onboard memory to handle the text, yet we're still signing in to websites the same way we did back in the 90s. Big problem.