Page Summary
bart-calendar.livejournal.com - (no subject)
bart-calendar.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kerrypolka.livejournal.com - (no subject)
supergee.livejournal.com - (no subject)
widgetfox.livejournal.com - (no subject)
atreic.livejournal.com - (no subject)
gonzo21.livejournal.com - (no subject)
elmyra.livejournal.com - (no subject)
lizw.livejournal.com - (no subject)
danieldwilliam.livejournal.com - (no subject)
bart-calendar.livejournal.com - (no subject)
channelpenguin.livejournal.com - (no subject)
hawkida.livejournal.com - (no subject)
undeadbydawn.livejournal.com - (no subject)
octopoid-horror.livejournal.com - (no subject)
d-c-m.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Active Entries
- 1: Interesting Links for 24-02-2026
- 2: Interesting Links for 23-02-2026
- 3: Interesting Links for 10-02-2026
- 4: Photo cross-post
- 5: Interesting Links for 22-02-2026
- 6: Interesting Links for 20-02-2026
- 7: Interesting Links for 21-02-2026
- 8: Interesting Links for 19-02-2026
- 9: Interesting Links for 18-02-2026
- 10: Life with two kids: A little curiosity
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 12:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 12:35 pm (UTC)1. Porn teaches you that your ideal partner will want to fuck you constantly and will always orgasm at the drop of a hat. Not a great message but not that damaging and there are people who end up in healthy relationships based on constant sex and easy orgasms.
2. Disney movies teach you that strong men will love you and keep you safe if you are pretty and helpless and that your weakness will bring out his strength. Not a great message, but I'm sure there are lots of healthy dom/sub relationships that fairly mimic this dynamic.
3. Romantic comedies teach you that your ideal partner will stalk you and/or that you can just wait around and fate will provide your ideal partner. These are both horrible ideas, since the first will get you stuck in a controlling and often violent relationship and the second idea is a good way to end up lonely and without any meaningful relationship at all.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 12:46 pm (UTC)It was very close between porn and romantic comedies, but at the end of romantic comedies everyone usually looks happy and you generally get the impression the people involve enjoy talking to each other and spending time together. Neither of these are true for mainstream porn.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 12:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 12:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 12:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 01:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 12:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 12:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 12:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 01:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 01:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 01:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 01:24 pm (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walt_Disney%27s_World_War_II_propaganda_production
no subject
Date: 2011-12-21 12:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-23 03:42 pm (UTC)The problem with questions like this is that they're predicated on a false (and harmful) assumption: that all porn and all romance are similar in nature.
Example of harm caused by porn here.
Example of situation where porn supports a relationship here.
I think it's apparent that these two case studies are talking about different kinds of pornography. (Sentencing for child pornography offences is a function of three variables: youth of child(ren), number of images and severity of what is shown.) Thus it is possible for what Nina Hartley says here and what Gail Dines says here to be true simultaneously. It is not an either-or. It is a both-and.
Similarly for romance: how it can heal and how it can harm. (Note that this last is a PhD thesis. I haven't read it all, but my impression from the abstract is that although it can be harmful, the wider picture is complicated.)
I do understand why you set up your polls as you do, but I question whether they achieve what you seek. I think an unintended consequence is that they continue to polarise and encourage absolutes, and I think that's problematic.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 01:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 01:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 01:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-21 04:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 01:03 pm (UTC)So we have parents running up massive debt to provide expensive toys to their children, and people who obsessively penny count every gift to their significant other to calculate exactly how much they do or do not love them.
So I'm picking capitalist consumerism as being most harmful to peoples ideas about relationships.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 01:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 01:26 pm (UTC)I don't know if this is true for everyone, or just me, or possibly true for more women than men (given that women are typically socialised to place more emphasis on romance as a goal.)
no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 02:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 03:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 01:29 pm (UTC)Partly for the reasons already mentioned about the appropriateness of borderline stalking behaviour and the agency of (mainly) women in seeking significant relationships.
My other critisism of Romantic Comedies is lack of exporation of the functioning of relationships and their ability to fulfil your needs. There isn’t much in your typical rom com about how long term relationships are created, maintained, go wrong and are repaired. Nor is there much discussion about how the significant relationship may or may not contribute to your overall life.
There appears to be very little in the way of conversations about shared values, the establishment of long term trust so that compromises can be made in a way that honours both individuals (or all the individuals) and the collective. Love is instant, respect is unearned and the relationships seem pre-destined to succeed once “trivial” obstacles have been overcome.
External friendships, careers or interests are often portrayed as a threat to the primacy of significant relationship.
Trivial obstacles ranging from a pre-existing significant relationship with someone who is morally suspect to a misunderstanding about shoes.
This is why I quite liked the relationship between Chandler and Monica in Friends. It was a bit contingent, the beginning was messy. The relationship had all manner of difficulties and the interaction of other aspects of the characters lives was important. Monica didn’t stop being an ambitous chef with OCD because she married Chandler. Chandler didn’t stop wanting to hang out with Joey, become sexually secure and develop a love for his job because he married Monica.
Reader I married him and we all lived happily ever after – without either of us having to make any futher efforts or changes or compromises. I’m not sure that’s a great message, especially when it is marketed as not explicitely a fantasy.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 02:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-21 09:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-21 02:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-21 02:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 01:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 01:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 03:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 03:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 09:59 pm (UTC)(See also: Poe's Law)
no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-12-20 08:01 pm (UTC)Answer based on gut feeling rather than any research...
no subject
Date: 2011-12-21 01:13 am (UTC)Amusing Anecdote: I was convinced to get counselling after Best Friend And Rediculously Hot Woman I Lived With [but not *actually*, strictly, partner. Even if she was. ish. briefly] mentioned that I would be Jack Nicholson in As Good As It gets in 10 years.
I epically love that film. Want to be him I did not. The scene where he tells her he's taking his medication - that was effectively a direct instruction, to me, to go get some.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-21 07:32 pm (UTC)Sex doesn't necessarily have a lot to do with relationships, although romantic comedies would often suggest that it does.
no subject
Date: 2011-12-22 02:49 pm (UTC)