andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2012-01-27 07:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philmophlegm.livejournal.com
Sorry. We'll just have to agree to disagree...

Date: 2012-01-27 08:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com
While the stories the Guardian breaks are sometimes important in the sense of being about events affecting the world in a big way, a celebrity story broken in the Daily Mail, on TMZ or in the pages of Hello! may well be seen as more important by individual people.

I care more about the SNP's position on corporation tax than I do the love-life of Justin Bieber or who was a bitch backstage at the X-Factor, but the latter two examples are going to sell more papers/magazines and so be important to people. (although I, like you, would have a different view of what's important)

Date: 2012-01-27 08:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philmophlegm.livejournal.com
The Daily Mail (the paper edition) really doesn't do much in the way of celebrity gossip - nowhere near as much as the website does. When it does, they are generally fluffy light-hearted articles rather than news stories.

Date: 2012-01-27 08:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] philmophlegm.livejournal.com
For a fairly topical one, how about the Stephen Lawrence thing?


It's a fairly important point made in that BBC website article that we're talking about the website, not the newspaper. The website does show some content from the newspaper, but an awful lot of the stories on the website don't appear in print. The print newspaper doesn't have much in the way of celebrity gossip for example.

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 12th, 2025 04:38 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios