Date: 2011-10-29 12:22 pm (UTC)
Without the time to look properly, that oxygen catalyst might be helpful but isn't going to be transformative of the energetics, and hence the economics. Catalysts lower the activation energy of a reaction, but not the energy difference between the starting and end products. So the best catalyst possible isn't going to make the water-splitting reaction anything but hard work in energy terms.

I had this argument with a physics student once back when I was a chemist. He thought if he could only fInd a way of splitting water easily, he'd have a great free source of energy, because you get a helluva a lot out when you burn hydrogen in oxygen. Not sure if I ever convinced him that splitting them apart again must take exactly te same amount of energy, at the absolute theoretical minimum if you had no inefficiency whatsoever.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 23rd, 2025 10:40 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios