andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2011-10-28 11:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hano.livejournal.com
time to up sticks and go to Dreamwidth I think...

Date: 2011-10-28 12:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] momentsmusicaux.livejournal.com
I'm pondering the upping sticks too.

Had a look at the import. Does it convert all the privacy settings on each post too?

Date: 2011-10-28 11:42 am (UTC)
cyprinella: broken neon sign that reads "lies & fish" (Default)
From: [personal profile] cyprinella
Has France always been this ban-happy or is this a new, reactionary government thing?

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] cyprinella - Date: 2011-10-28 12:17 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] momentsmusicaux.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 12:34 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] alitheapipkin.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 12:38 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] skington.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 12:44 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 06:08 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2011-10-28 12:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] skington.livejournal.com
It's not a ban, merely a refusal to acknowledge vegetarianism (or veganism).

And yes, the French take school dinners, and the quality of food in general, very seriously.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] momentsmusicaux.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 12:34 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] skington.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 12:38 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] fearmeforiampink - Date: 2011-10-28 11:40 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2011-10-28 12:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alitheapipkin.livejournal.com
I was right there with the anti-wheat guy until he said people should eat soy products instead. Soy is evil in an entirely different way - currently responsible for high rates of deforestation in the Amazon and it trashes soil fertility. When did food chices get some complicated? I can't win :( Even the co-op have started using palm oil in their own brand products despite it being the number 1 cause of deforestation in SE Asia.

Date: 2011-10-28 01:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nancylebov.livejournal.com
Also, he was talking about people gaining a bit over 40 pounds/year because of excess calories and appetite from wheat.

I can believe there are people who gain 40 pounds in a year, though I don't think its very common for non-dieters. However, year after year? 200 pounds in five years? Rare. 400 pounds in 10 years? Hardly anyone.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] alitheapipkin.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 02:17 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2011-10-28 06:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com
The anti-wheat guy almost sounded alright until the last "hey, try the placebo effect that you could get from any diet, bad science celebrity endorsed fad or otherwise!" bit

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] anton-p-nym.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 06:30 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2011-10-28 12:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] spacelem.livejournal.com
The French ban thing (okay, it isn't technically a ban) seems like a very dogmatic approach to me. I don't think that a vegetarian diet is essentially unhealthy for children of school age (although I have yet to be convinced about vegan diets).

In addition to the "won't eat" people, what about the "can't eat" people? They say that they can only offer one meal option per day. Do they take equal care for gluten intolerant children? For lactose intolerant children? What about nut allergies? Are they just going to decide that everyone who isn't catered for by their particular diet just has to go elsewhere?

I recall my school offering many different options, with separate salad bar and snack bar. It seems that France's restrictions are more like sheer bloody mindedness than due to any practical reasoning.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] spacelem.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 02:40 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2011-10-31 02:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] naath.livejournal.com
For a small school it's much easier to make just one thing than lots of options; and if you give options and let the kids choose freely then it's harder to ensure that they all take some of every kind of nutrient than if you are just dishing up single meals.

I expect the in-practice solution is for children who can't/won't eat whatever the canteen is offering to bring in their own lunch. Which is more effort for parents.

Date: 2011-10-28 01:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johncoxon.livejournal.com
I will move over to Dreamwidth when they give me an incentive to abandon my permanent account. Seriously, it bemuses me that they don't offer paid account trials for LiveJournal's permanent account holders. Also, I'd like to see massive and radical changes to the UX (the system is crap, it's been crap since I signed up for LiveJournal, please can we have a different one now?) and I'd like some actually decent journal styles, since all the existing ones are fugly.

Also, am I the only person in the world that thinks it'd be much easier just to tell businesses to open 8am–4pm instead of changing the time zone over? I don't get why we can't just do it that way.
Edited Date: 2011-10-28 01:52 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] johncoxon.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 02:14 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] johncoxon.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 04:50 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] johncoxon.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 05:36 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] johncoxon.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 05:58 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] johncoxon.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 06:33 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] johncoxon.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 06:37 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] johncoxon.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 06:40 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] johncoxon.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 06:46 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] spacelem.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-29 09:25 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2011-10-28 01:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] channelpenguin.livejournal.com
Wheat is evil. Sugar is more evil.

Apple make a decent profit on each device sold, Samsung don't, so market share as raw numbers-of-units is a little misleading.

Date: 2011-10-28 04:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johncoxon.livejournal.com
What's more misleading is the fact that Apple lost sales during that quarter due to persistent rumours of an imminent refresh, so the quarter isn't representative of sales (as Andrew already noted in his link description). I would be astonished if Apple does not reassert its dominance in the next quarter's results.

Although I agree that profits are a more reliable indicator of market share than units sold, I wouldn't say it's 'misleading' – it's not like the article isn't completely crystal clear about the measure it's using. It might actually be more helpful, I suppose, to discuss 'profit share' and 'user share', since those are basically the two things you're discussing.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] johncoxon.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 05:34 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] johncoxon.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 05:37 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] johncoxon.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 06:02 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] johncoxon.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 06:34 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] johncoxon.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 06:38 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] johncoxon.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 06:45 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2011-10-28 05:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] apostle-of-eris.livejournal.com
I still don't understand the stupidity at Google. Being sort of socially clueless is no surprise, but technically?
Real Names Only is simply impossible. It cannot be implemented. duh

Date: 2011-10-28 11:33 pm (UTC)
fearmeforiampink: (Baby's Shoes)
From: [personal profile] fearmeforiampink
But if they can get 90-95% of their userbase using their real names, then those people are more attractive to Google's advertisers.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] naath.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-31 02:23 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2011-10-28 05:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] apostle-of-eris.livejournal.com
WIRED had two or three good years, until they ran out of material; and then got sold a few times.
Does anyone under 30 even still care about Stranger in a Strange Land? I have no idea.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com - Date: 2011-10-28 06:11 pm (UTC) - Expand

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
45 6 7 8 9 10
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 10th, 2026 05:26 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios