Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Interesting Links for 21-04-2025
- 2: Interesting Links for 22-04-2025
- 3: Interesting Links for 20-04-2025
- 4: Photo cross-post
- 5: Interesting Links for 18-04-2025
- 6: A thought about the transgender court case - and the ECHR
- 7: Interesting Links for 19-04-2025
- 8: Review: Planet of Lana
- 9: A brief summary of the Transgender/Equality Act court case
- 10: A thing I wish Google Maps could do
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2011-09-10 11:57 pm (UTC)those rules are something I shall endeavour to follow - and indeed more or less did with that car park design. I wish more product designers would. It really is amazing how many things are made with an absurd quantity of unnecessary guff tagged on
It needs to be clarified that the final rule - which you emphasise - relates to knowing what to leave out, rather than underdesigning. I think this is something that's going to be a lot more prominent in years to come.
interestingly, the German judgement in Apple vs Samsung more or less states that copying someone else's design does *not* count as innovation. Using the very curious 'stifling' argument isn't going to work.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-09-11 03:03 pm (UTC)