andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker
[Poll #1640977]
From.
And now...breakfast.

(Note - Approximations and lesser versions count. For instance, I'm ticking 7, because I went through a period where I avoided dealing with a bunch of stuff, because it felt easier to do so.)

Date: 2010-11-05 09:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] call-waiting.livejournal.com
My answers to many of these are very different if "person" or "people" is "me" or "other people".

Date: 2010-11-05 09:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com
*Clicks answer*

*Clicks link*

Ah. Hm. See, I have trouble with the word 'beliefs'. I do not believe any of these things. That doesn't mean I don't feel them sometimes. I don't want to give the erroneous impression that I'm the only completely non-dysfunctional person (in the poll so far) that you know...

Date: 2010-11-05 09:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com
See, this is why I sometimes think I might be a tad sociopathic.

I have a lot of conflicting pieces of social programming that fight it out in my psyche on a pretty much constant basis, but the truth is that whatever bits of me are saying - that I should be working harder, beating myself up more (or less), feeling victimised, feeling like the bad guy, a failure, lucky or unlucky - the brutal truth is that if I'm comfortable, I don't much care why or how I got there; only that I'm comfortable.

I don't need to have got there through hard work, through talent, luck, or anything else. I don't need to be working to feel worthwhile and I make the effort to stay in a job not because I want to be productive but because I know I'd be less comfortable, on balance, on benefits (in many respects, not merely financial). I have no ambition to be more than I am as long as where I am is sustainable - although that's not to say I won't take the opportunity to move further to be more comfortable as long as it's not inconvenient. Any aspirations I ever had toward something more exalted than that are long-since gone.

So ultimately, although I have heard all of these things said in my head, and parroted them to society at large, the real truth is that I don't really feel accountable to any internal guilt/victim-machine. Perhaps this is because my first Ethic, the Protestant Work Ethic (point 2 above), is so completely unforgiving and unfeasible that it had to be rejected outright but nonetheless couldn't be replaced. For whatever reason, my internal workings hold me to be entirely responsible for any failure, but simultaneously just don't care that much. Anything else is just Pretend.

As to other people, all someone has to be doing to gain a base level of respect is to, to my perception, be 'making the effort' - whatever that might mean in context. It won't make them someone I associate with necessarily but it will make them someone who's basic ethics I have no problem with.

So ultimately I'm pretty unrepentantly self-interested. I wouldn't screw someone over to get ahead, but mainly because I don't care enough. I don't always take the path of least resistance, but mainly because I sometimes like conflict. I don't hold people to ridiculously high values in practice, but mainly because when it comes to principles I don't make my own cut anyway so how could anyone else? And since beating myself up about my own inability to meet my own socially programmed standards would make me less comfortable with my life... I don't.

So I guess what I'm saying is that there are all sorts of very normal 'awfulizations' that have gone through my mind throughout my life. But I've never really cared much about any of them.

(I also hold the view that most people work exactly the same way, but saying that tends to have people up-in-arms because I'm suggesting that everyone is secretly self-interested and no one ever really holds themselves accountable for anything, and for some reason people don't like it when you imply that about them.)

Date: 2010-11-05 11:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] channelpenguin.livejournal.com
you sound *extremely* like me.

I have been described as somewhat sociopathic - but that was by someone I considered *over* sensitive to social mores/pressures/other people.

I am driven to "be good at stuff" (I wouldn't call it a Work Ethic) but not for any reason other than my own emotional satisfaction. I'm just not happy being cr@p/passable/average at stuff. I did learn, about 7 years ago, to cut other people slack, but me? hmm, not really.

Date: 2010-11-05 12:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nancylebov.livejournal.com
"Guilt/victim machine" is very good.

Date: 2010-11-05 09:41 am (UTC)
ext_9215: (Default)
From: [identity profile] hfnuala.livejournal.com
I only believe no 2 for myself. Which is both arrogant and self hating - why don't I deserve the slack I give to others?

Date: 2010-11-05 09:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lizw.livejournal.com
My life improved tremendously once I started treating it as a moral duty not to be harder on myself than on other people. It seems to be a difficult one to get across to people, though.

Date: 2010-11-05 09:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lizw.livejournal.com
Hey, this is kind of cool - it makes me realise that I've made quite a bit of progress over the years in recognising those beliefs as irrational and learning to act less as if I hold them. Thanks!

Date: 2010-11-05 10:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bohemiancoast.livejournal.com
Some of these are ones that I think I had as a child, that they are normal for children, especially in their milder forms, and that failure to let go of them as you age is part of what we point to when we say that people haven't grown up effectively. I think 3, 4 and 8 in particular. And I'm interested that only one of these refers explicitly to the distinction we draw between children and adults.

Date: 2010-11-05 10:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nmg.livejournal.com
Quite. I can see quite a few of these in the [livejournal.com profile] garklet. When I see the same beliefs in adults (or rather, the evidence of those beliefs in their actions), I try to be sensitive to their views, but inevitably end up thinking that they need to get a sense of proportion.

Most of the beliefs are the expression of either an abrogation of personal responsibility, a Manichean worldview, or that one is the most important thing in the universe. Most people grow out of them.

Number 11 reminds me...

Date: 2010-11-05 10:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sigmonster.livejournal.com
"To every human problem there is a solution: simple, convincing, and wrong." - H. L. Mencken

Date: 2010-11-05 10:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meaningrequired.livejournal.com
9. My "area" is behaviour modification and change. So I know that people do change and I know some of the theories of the process. However, before that, and occasionally now I forget people can change, and often do.

6. Also, I hate being hypervigilant, but it happens. So the best thing I can do now is to accept it, intellectualise the issue, decide on action and put it out of my head. When my emotions get a bit angsty, insert distractions, because whatever it is, I've already taken care of it.

2. I still struggle with this problem, because about 4 years ago I started to derive self-esteme from an external source. External sources are not reliable, and for me, it needs to be internal. I've spent the last year trying to reroute this.

Date: 2010-11-05 11:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meaningrequired.livejournal.com
To others? I'm confused? You asked us to assess the list refering to ourselves?

Date: 2010-11-05 11:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meaningrequired.livejournal.com
You had different instructions at 9am didnt you!

These are all common negative beliefs that people hold. I have a book somewhere that has a chapter similar to this that would make an interesting LJ post.

Unfortunately, I have no free time!

Date: 2010-11-05 10:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cairmen.livejournal.com
I'm not answering these, but for clarification - do you mean that you conciously believe these are right, or you tend to act according to them?

Date: 2010-11-05 11:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meaningrequired.livejournal.com
In cognitive behavoiour therapy, you could kind of view them as automatic negative beliefs.

For example "If I can't do x then that means I am a failure".
Edited Date: 2010-11-05 11:04 am (UTC)

Date: 2010-11-05 11:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] channelpenguin.livejournal.com
Only No 2. for me. Though only the first part

"One absolutely must be competent, adequate and achieving in all important respects"

There is no "or else". Maybe that's an even worse attitude :-)

The rest have always been, to me, obviously silly.

The exact *oppposite* of No 8. is far too seductively appealing to me on some emotional level - but is so clearly ludicrous in terms of practicality (we all stand on the shoulders of giants etc...) that it's never made belief status.

No 4. it's not awful or terrible - but, for me, not to be put up with if at all possible. A sign that I need to do something about it to sort it out to more how I would like it (if at all practical to do so).

Date: 2010-11-05 11:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] channelpenguin.livejournal.com
to clarify - I meant No2 for ME only. I never even considered it in respect of other people. Which is possibly interesting in itself.

Date: 2010-11-05 06:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] channelpenguin.livejournal.com
well, if my parents hadn't got it on I wouldn't be here, so yeah, in that sense :-)

Date: 2010-11-05 11:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] theferrett.livejournal.com
As others have mentioned, I hold many of these beliefs on a personal level, but I have never made them universal.

Date: 2010-11-05 01:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alextfish.livejournal.com
I ticked a few of these that I used to hold, or that I have caught myself acting as if I believed.

But I'm somewhat surprised to see 8 on there. I didn't use to believe that, but I do now. I appreciate it's not the most common belief, but I do believe that humans are fundamentally not designed to operate alone. We work far better in relationships, and so "independence" is either an illusion or at best a partial thing.

Perhaps I'm just misinterpreting the question, though (and it's not exactly clear when it switches pronouns partway through :->). I can certainly see that excessive dependence and "neediness" are things to be avoided (in adults), and people operate best when able to conduct a certain amount of independent activity.

But I think there's a common thread in society, particularly the more capitalist bits of it, that people should be able to be entirely independent, and any kind of dependence is inherently bad and to be avoided. And I think that's just false (as well as impossible).

Date: 2010-11-05 01:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eatsoylentgreen.livejournal.com
I don't like this list, it's too extreme. They're difficult to click yes. If you modify the points (do I like to be liked? sure I do!) they're impossible to click no.

Date: 2010-11-05 02:16 pm (UTC)
zz: (Default)
From: [personal profile] zz
some of these remind me of the geek social fallacies too.

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 56 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 15th, 2026 06:48 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios