In some ways, I'm somewhat boggled. That just users on Twitter, after all. And nearly 2500 clicks is a pretty big number.
On the other hand, that's less than a hundred clicks per day. From 167 "followers". So someone's not pulling their weight :->
Oh, and that includes people clicking on retweets, which is where I think the highest number of clicks come from.
"Direct" in the left-hand pie chart means "from an app that doesn't send info about what it is." The orange slice just above Twitter.com is Tweetdeck.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-10 07:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-10 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-10 09:07 pm (UTC)As far as generating actual traffic goes, your links posts generate *far* more traffic than the equivalent posts on Liberal Conspiracy used to, or the LDV Daily Dozen, and roughly equivalent to When Fangirls Attack or Journalista!
no subject
Date: 2010-10-10 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-10 10:13 pm (UTC)The power of the network on LJ and similar is still, despite decline, much bigger than that of the 'big' mainstream blogs.
I rarely if ever click on the link from Twitter, as I'm using that at a different time and reason normally, but do virtually always click them from the combined post, so I'm one of those "not pulling my weight" except I tend to click on the overwhelming majority (unless It's something I know I've already read).
The old linkdump posts on LC weren't ever as succesful as they could've been, I'd be curious actually how well a well promoted inline link does that's said as crucial for the article.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-10 08:58 pm (UTC)http://andrewducker.livejournal.com/2187026.html?thread=15401234#t15401234
no subject
Date: 2010-10-10 09:01 pm (UTC)