Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Life with two kids: Wednesday shoes
- 2: Interesting Links for 30-10-2025
- 3: Interesting Links for 29-10-2025
- 4: Life with two kids: one of whom will sleep
- 5: Interesting Links for 23-10-2025
- 6: Interesting Links for 28-10-2025
- 7: Interesting Links for 17-10-2025
- 8: Photo cross-post
- 9: Interesting Links for 27-10-2025
- 10: Life with two kids: Very wet test subjects
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2010-06-23 01:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-23 01:27 pm (UTC)Because if we're talking average salaries, sure.
If we're talking childrearing, or primary school teaching (I broke off a friendship with a girl over that one - 'male primary teachers just aren't natural'), or paternity leave, not so much. If we're talking those roles even being valued, then not so much.
That's why 'patriarchy' is a harmful term. It obscures who's penalised.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-23 01:31 pm (UTC)Because I basically agree with you. I know _why_ it has the name it has, but I don't find the general phrasing of it very useful.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-23 01:36 pm (UTC)Originally (when I was 15), I assumed it meant men in charge, and the mythical boardroom. How awful, sure don't want to be one of those villains. Later, I learned it was more general and described male dominance - how awful, I'll try not to be one of them either. But when I read arguments about how there's a patriarchy dominating, say, a woman-run charity, I lose track of what problem is being described.