Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Interesting Links for 15-09-2025
- 2: Interesting Links for 12-09-2025
- 3: Interesting Links for 09-09-2025
- 4: Interesting Links for 11-09-2025
- 5: Photo cross-post
- 6: Photo cross-post
- 7: Interesting Links for 08-09-2025
- 8: Interesting Links for 06-09-2025
- 9: Interesting Links for 07-09-2025
- 10: Interesting Links for 05-09-2025
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2010-06-23 01:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-23 01:27 pm (UTC)Because if we're talking average salaries, sure.
If we're talking childrearing, or primary school teaching (I broke off a friendship with a girl over that one - 'male primary teachers just aren't natural'), or paternity leave, not so much. If we're talking those roles even being valued, then not so much.
That's why 'patriarchy' is a harmful term. It obscures who's penalised.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-23 01:31 pm (UTC)Because I basically agree with you. I know _why_ it has the name it has, but I don't find the general phrasing of it very useful.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-23 01:36 pm (UTC)Originally (when I was 15), I assumed it meant men in charge, and the mythical boardroom. How awful, sure don't want to be one of those villains. Later, I learned it was more general and described male dominance - how awful, I'll try not to be one of them either. But when I read arguments about how there's a patriarchy dominating, say, a woman-run charity, I lose track of what problem is being described.