I wonder if it's intentional that the influence of Tom Baker's scarf just about reaches the full range of Doctors in Old Who, and doesn't go near the New Who trio?
Colin Baker just isn't garish enough. (And I never thought I'd have occasion to utter that sentence.)
Eccleston is perhaps the least convincing of the lot, but I don't think there's really any way to render him recognisably as an owl. His Doctor was just fundamentally non-owl-shaped.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-18 03:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-18 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-18 03:44 pm (UTC)I wonder if it's intentional that the influence of Tom Baker's scarf just about reaches the full range of Doctors in Old Who, and doesn't go near the New Who trio?
no subject
Date: 2010-06-18 03:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-22 11:26 am (UTC)That'd be awkward to show with the scarf though, of course.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-18 04:03 pm (UTC)Eccleston is perhaps the least convincing of the lot, but I don't think there's really any way to render him recognisably as an owl. His Doctor was just fundamentally non-owl-shaped.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-18 04:37 pm (UTC)Agree that 10's eyes are great. But 5 makes a terribly owl and 6 and 11 don't look much like themselves! I like 3's expression!
no subject
Date: 2010-06-18 11:19 pm (UTC)