Dear Everyone,
If you hear that a friend of yours has done something terrible, please go and talk to them and find out if the rumours are true _before_ judging them or joining in the general condemnation.
Similarly, if they do something which you find hurtful, please talk to them and say something along the lines of "When you did X, I felt Y. Did you mean to hurt me in that way?", rather than assuming that they were trying to stab you repeatedly with a sharp knife.
Once you have ascertained that your erstwhile friend really _does_ strangle puppies in their spare time, then feel free to cast them forever more from your social circle, keep the DVDs you borrowed from them, and post embarassing photos of them on Facebook. But if you don't do your fact-checking before your ostracising then you're not being anything like a good friend. You are, in fact, being a jerk.
All the best,
Andy
(No, this is not aimed at any one specific person - there are three separate people I know who are having issues around this _right now_, and I've seen it happen innumerable times.)
If you hear that a friend of yours has done something terrible, please go and talk to them and find out if the rumours are true _before_ judging them or joining in the general condemnation.
Similarly, if they do something which you find hurtful, please talk to them and say something along the lines of "When you did X, I felt Y. Did you mean to hurt me in that way?", rather than assuming that they were trying to stab you repeatedly with a sharp knife.
Once you have ascertained that your erstwhile friend really _does_ strangle puppies in their spare time, then feel free to cast them forever more from your social circle, keep the DVDs you borrowed from them, and post embarassing photos of them on Facebook. But if you don't do your fact-checking before your ostracising then you're not being anything like a good friend. You are, in fact, being a jerk.
All the best,
Andy
(No, this is not aimed at any one specific person - there are three separate people I know who are having issues around this _right now_, and I've seen it happen innumerable times.)
no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 12:17 pm (UTC)Then, N years later, she meets a symbologist [sic] from Harvard, who tells her "it's ok, he was having sex as part of some ritual, which has all sorts of laudable reasons" and she immediately recants all her hate and feels awful for condemning him so quickly.
It all just seemed so inconsistent.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 05:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 12:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 12:30 pm (UTC)I was angry with my friend:
I told my wrath, my wrath did end.
I was angry with my foe;
I told it not, my wrath did grow.
And I water'd it in fears,
Night & morning with my tears;
And I sunned it with my smiles
And with soft deceitful wiles.
And it grew both day and night,
Till it bore an apple bright;
And my foe beheld it shine,
And he knew that it was mine,
And into my garden stole
When the night had veil'd the pole:
In the morning glad I see
My foe outstretch'd beneath the tree
no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 02:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 01:14 pm (UTC)This is well said. We have been kind of going through similar stuff this weekend and thankfully someone who had read something approached us and a few emails soon cleared up the issues and allowed us to defend stuff said by others, which sadly could have resulted in a lost friendship which would have caused major distress for my husband(to be) and I as it is someone we hold dear. It is true that human nature chooses condemnation over interogation most times as we are loathe for confrontation but I applaud your post.
I shall now go and steal young boys footballs and paint KKK symbols on front doors!
no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 01:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 01:43 pm (UTC)And yes, I try to avoid judgement until I can verify things, even if that means withholding judgement entirely.
I remember being berated by one of my friends for not taking sides in an argument between two other friends. I said I was waiting to hear both sides and understand it better. And lo and behold, two days later the two friends were getting on ok again, leaving my friend feeling both a bit silly, and also aggrieved at the pair of them for getting her all worked up.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 02:08 pm (UTC)And it's one of the most annoying things in TV (particularly comedies), as either the FARCE set up (where one person misinterprets what someone else has said or done, sometimes because they only hear part of a conversation or because they've seen something out of context) or where one person makes some (erroneous) assumption and refuses to let the other person explain but instead storms off or plots revenge. I am growing to loathe that as a major plot driver.
You know the sort of scene ...
Tom speaking to Bob: "that's ridiculous, that's as bad as if I said ..."
(Jenny is approaching and starts to hear the conversation)
Tom: "... Kate has been having an affair and is going to have another man's child ..."
(Jenny runs away to spread the gossip)
Tom:"..., wouldn't that a ridiculous thing to say?"
Bob: "Yep, should never have accused you of supporting City. Friends?"
Tom: "Always" ... they hug, manfully. Meanwhile Kate's parents are hearing the story from Jenny ...
no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 02:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 05:41 pm (UTC)"I know I'm right and they are wrong" or "I'm too important, they will bend to what I want" or some other variant on Hubris/Nemesis.
I guess that's one of the reasons that while I appreciate Frasier, I don't really like it, and would usually turn over/turn off when it came on.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 02:44 pm (UTC)The other because I discovered I was an utter bastard all by myself.
Both times, had people Who Knew Stuff just bloody well spoken to me it would all have been vastly easier. Which is exactly what happens now - and I'm infinitely happier for it, as are those I love.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 03:00 pm (UTC)The example you cite is typical of old-time Fan Feuds -- X & Y have a Strong Disagreement, their friends pile on ... and in a few months X & Y are getting along quite well together, while some of thier friends are still Not Speaking to one-another (which, granted, might be for the best, considering what they'd say/write if they _were_ in closer communication). I suspect there's something of the Drama Queen in most of us -- a tendency to take ourselves & our feelings too seriously -- and repeated burnings and the passage of years may be needed to cause it to fade.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 03:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 03:18 pm (UTC)Assume, in order:
- blind, literal thoughtlessness: simple innocent forgetting to think or having too much going on to think
- personal issues, again causing a blind spot
- stupidity
- malice
no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 03:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 03:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-08 08:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 03:28 pm (UTC)Yep, and also: if the person who told you that a friend was behaving terribly is themselves a known liar, it might be worth revising your initial opinion. Not everyone is completely innocent and free from malice, even those you think may be 'doing you a favour'.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 04:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 06:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 05:41 pm (UTC)What if that were applied to political news?
no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 05:45 pm (UTC)http://www.slate.com/id/2256068/
:->
no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-07 11:24 pm (UTC)though not recently, mainly due to not being upset myself and therefore getting rid of my emotional energy by over angsting and whining about stuff.
though i dread to think about some of what gets said about me
no subject
Date: 2010-06-08 09:57 am (UTC)So B sent me a very hurt email, but the amazing thing they did is STARTING by saying "B said you said this, and this hurt me for this reason, what were you playing at?!?!?" and I was able to respond immediately saying I'd certainly not intended to say anything of the kind. It'd have been entirely understandable for them to just rip into me, but they didn't, and it was lovely.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-08 12:49 pm (UTC)This.
But if you don't do your fact-checking before your ostracising then you're not being anything like a good friend. You are, in fact, being a jerk.
This, only more so.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 06:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 07:00 am (UTC)I've had a similar thing myself a couple of years back, where people were trying to protect me from a situation without asking me if I actually wanted to be protected, or even checking if the situation was what they thought it was.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 11:11 am (UTC)I find your threads/thoughts to be normally quite inciteful; this one however should be binned along with such helpful advice as "Don`t forget to breathe while walking" or how about "Running in front of a speeding train is dangerous"
All of this is obvious and should not need to be stated.
In another post you talked about why more people are reading LJ but no longer posting (includes me). Threads like this are (for me anyway) one of the reasons why.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-10 11:50 am (UTC)