Date: 2010-05-25 03:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com
Perhaps you've 'unpacked' my viewpoint. I, however, understood yours to start with, I thought you were wrong then, I think you're still wrong now, and if you haven't come to agree with me I'd consider the exchange pretty unproductive in every respect - it neither interests me nor edifies me that you've managed to grasp my argument.

I'm glad that you got something out of the exchange but I'm afraid all I gained was a backlog of editing work and an irritation at my own inability to avoid going down pointless cul-de-sacs with people who're incapable of making a distinction between silly semantic asides and serious questions about personal responsibility, consent, the nature of sexual agency and the role of the active participant in any physical context.

In short, don't patronise me.
Edited Date: 2010-05-25 03:33 pm (UTC)

Date: 2010-05-25 03:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zornhau.livejournal.com
Patronising not intended. Didn't mean to draw you in. Didn't mean to be drawn in, actually.

The downside of electronic communication is that it is free of non-verbal cues and verbal intonation. Mine at the moment would be very respectful.

Date: 2010-05-25 03:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com
Ah, whereas I by contrast am probably nicer and more patient on the internet that I am in person.

Date: 2010-05-25 03:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zornhau.livejournal.com
Now I'm scared.

Take care

Z

October 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Nov. 1st, 2025 09:19 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios