Gosh, the new google fonts can be pretty
May. 24th, 2010 11:32 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
You can do stuff like this!
Or this!
See here for how it works.
(At least, I get two cool fonts in Firefox, dunno how well it works in IE)
EDIT: Gah! LJ is turning the "quote marks" into 39's - it's escaping them.
Any idea how to work around that in LJ?
no subject
Date: 2010-05-24 10:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-24 10:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-24 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-24 10:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-24 10:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-24 10:49 pm (UTC)You can do stuff like this!
Test
no subject
Date: 2010-05-24 10:51 pm (UTC)Any idea how to work around that in LJ?
no subject
Date: 2010-05-24 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-24 10:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-24 10:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-24 10:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-24 10:54 pm (UTC)[link href='http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Tangerine' rel='stylesheet' type='text/css']
I'm assuming it needs to be in the header of the page, not inline, and LJ doesn't like stuff that embeds off site stuff. I have no idea how to work around it on a post by post basis, but suspect it could be hacked into S2 layers.
It's a nice idea, but...
no subject
Date: 2010-05-24 10:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-25 07:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-25 08:38 am (UTC)Will play on my DW later, I can access my code there, free account on LJ, no code access.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-25 12:04 am (UTC)There should be no way to work around it in LJ: wasn't the last XSS attack because they'd left a JS hole in their CSS stuff?
no subject
Date: 2010-05-25 12:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-25 08:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-25 08:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-27 08:45 pm (UTC)