Date: 2010-05-12 01:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anton-p-nym.livejournal.com
Here in Ontario we had a plebicite on electoral reform alongside our last provincial election, asking voters to choose between "first past the post" and "mixed-member proportional" systems; MMP would be implemented if it received a 66% majority overall and a majority in all ridings. The returns came in 68% for FPTP; MMP was viewed as too cumbersome (and potentially abusable by party whips) to be worth the gains.

Total Representation, I think, would've had a better showing though I'm far from certain it would've achieved the necessary supermajority.

-- Steve objects to political systems that further empower party fanatics, with a particular eye on the toxic sump that is Israel's pure-PR Knesset.

Date: 2010-05-12 01:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mooism.livejournal.com
Total Representation doesn't seem to provide any incentive for the party holding a safe seat to do much campaigning there: it doesn't matter whether you win by 10% or 30%, you still only get the one MP for that seat, and the excess votes cast for your successful local candidate won't count towards electing your party's other candidates at the second stage.

Date: 2010-05-12 07:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 0olong.livejournal.com
First link seems to be broken?

Date: 2010-05-12 08:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 0olong.livejournal.com
Still not for me - but I did get a Google cached version of the page.

September 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 14th, 2025 07:21 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios