
The Golden Compass suffers somewhat from Harry Potter syndrome - it's a much loved book with lots going on in it, where it's not possible to cut out much of the plot without making the film _completely_ incomprehensible.
So they solved it in much the same way the first two Potter films did - by keeping all the vital scenes in, but cutting them down to their basics and leaving out all the connecting bits that actually make you care about the characters.
So characters wander onto the stage, get their five lines and wander off again, only to turn up for the climax later, people are drawn in so thinly that you're left wondering why they exist at all - were it not necessary for them to interact with some other paper thing character.
It's not that any of it is actively _bad_ - it's just that the overall effect is of listening to a badly scratched CD, skipping from recognisable refrain to much-loved chunk of chorus, only actually becoming coherent in the final twenty minutes.
I didn't hate it. It's very pretty. I'd go and see the other two, if they got made. It's just a shame they aren't making, say, 5 films of the trilogy (two for the first, two for the second, one for the third, that being how much plot there actually is in it).
6/10