Losing your equilibrium
Dec. 11th, 2002 05:45 pmPenny Arcade had this rather good review of Equilibrium, which I'm looking forward to:
It is the same thing with Equilibrium. I firmly believe that objectivity is mythological in this context, people just like some things or don't like them, and then they craft elaborate mechanisms after the fact to explain why or why not. Many reviewers, for instance, get really caught up on some of the material the film uses for inspiration - classic dystopian works like F451 or Brave New World - isn't treated the way they think it should be. I don't know if somebody told them it wasn't an action movie, or what, but this narrative quality compares favorably with most, if not all, movies of the genre. I don't know if you've seen Commando. It's not Proust. Nor is Equilibrium Orwell. It takes what it needs to and hurtles forward.
The cries of "Matrix Ripoff" were predictable, but sort of sad. To paint The Matrix as some kind of solitary, unaided fundamental of modern sci-fi action without recognizing the liberal plunder of Gibson, Stephenson, and Woo is laughable. I don't want to hear it. You don't have to hate Equilibrium to like The Matrix, or vice-versa. They aren't sporting teams, they're fucking action movies. And if you think that Gun-Kata, the fighting style of the Grammaton Clericks is somehow derivative of The Matrix, then you are an alien being from another planet. Who knows how, or why, but they pulled off two of the most inventive action scenes I've ever witnessed. I actually covered my mouth with my hand and stopped breathing.
I guess it depends why you're going to it. I expected sci-fi lite with inventive action scenes, and pow, direct hit. If you're expecting 1984: The Movie it is not for you, and if you're expecting a big-budget special effects spectacular this is not for you.
It is the same thing with Equilibrium. I firmly believe that objectivity is mythological in this context, people just like some things or don't like them, and then they craft elaborate mechanisms after the fact to explain why or why not. Many reviewers, for instance, get really caught up on some of the material the film uses for inspiration - classic dystopian works like F451 or Brave New World - isn't treated the way they think it should be. I don't know if somebody told them it wasn't an action movie, or what, but this narrative quality compares favorably with most, if not all, movies of the genre. I don't know if you've seen Commando. It's not Proust. Nor is Equilibrium Orwell. It takes what it needs to and hurtles forward.
The cries of "Matrix Ripoff" were predictable, but sort of sad. To paint The Matrix as some kind of solitary, unaided fundamental of modern sci-fi action without recognizing the liberal plunder of Gibson, Stephenson, and Woo is laughable. I don't want to hear it. You don't have to hate Equilibrium to like The Matrix, or vice-versa. They aren't sporting teams, they're fucking action movies. And if you think that Gun-Kata, the fighting style of the Grammaton Clericks is somehow derivative of The Matrix, then you are an alien being from another planet. Who knows how, or why, but they pulled off two of the most inventive action scenes I've ever witnessed. I actually covered my mouth with my hand and stopped breathing.
I guess it depends why you're going to it. I expected sci-fi lite with inventive action scenes, and pow, direct hit. If you're expecting 1984: The Movie it is not for you, and if you're expecting a big-budget special effects spectacular this is not for you.