Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Interesting Links for 10-03-2026
- 2: Life with two children: Gideon updates
- 3: Photo cross-post
- 4: Interesting Links for 14-03-2026
- 5: Interesting Links for 13-03-2026
- 6: I need to know when it's okay to tell your partner you love them
- 7: Interesting Links for 11-03-2026
- 8: Interesting Links for 12-03-2026
- 9: Links Extra: More data than you ever wanted.
- 10: Interesting Links for 09-03-2026
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2010-04-08 11:43 am (UTC)Oh, what a load of old bollocks.
Don't get me wrong, I think that story's awful. I also think that it should have got way more exposure than it did - frankly I'm astounded it didn't appear in the same major publications as part of the same story. I also agree that it probably didn't for the exact reason cited - it was seen as a 'trans' issue and not a 'gay' issue, and we all know trannies are creepier than gays, so they get less support from the liberal media.
But please. Whatever the intentions or motivations of the Principal making the original decision, are we really to think that, the issue having blown up as it did, people were making a distinction between the fact she wanted to take a girl as her date and the fact she wanted to wear a tux? That the two issues were being seen and dealt with separately by everyone concerned?
I don't remember, at any point in the coverage, the challenged officials saying, "Oh, it was just the cross-dressing we were bothered about, not the homosexuality." And let's be honest, they'd have jumped at the chance in their ignorance of the wider issue, wouldn't they?
And let's not forget the wider issue. Whether this is about lesbianism or transgenderism, the overriding issue is freedom of expression. I caught on this story and wrote about it because it affected a young lesbian, and therefore resonated with me, but I didn't frame it as a 'gay' issue. I didn't bang the drum of 'gay rights'. It's as much about her being able to wear what she likes as about her being able to take who she likes.
So if this writer is being accused of trying to 'hijack' the 'issue' off the gays, well, they're wrong. They're hijacking the issue away from everyone.
Aside: For the record, I may not have attended many dances in my rural High School days but I attended every single one I was at in a button-down shirt and trousers, and no one ever batted an eyelid. I think there might have been eyelids batted if I'd taken a girl as my date.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-08 12:16 pm (UTC)Everyone knew what was going on, but because they made the effort to on the surface conform to societal norms everyone was happy.
Today, it seems sort of silly that everyone went to that much effort, but it was 20 years ago.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-08 12:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-08 12:32 pm (UTC)The kids always knew, the school always knew it was just an illusion so grandparents could look at heteronormative prom photos.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-08 07:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-13 03:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-08 12:11 pm (UTC)A crossdressing dude is much more socially threatening than a gay girl, no matter what culture you are in.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-08 07:42 pm (UTC)That's very odd. I only have a partial understanding of the math involved, and I didn't expect it to be nearly as widely applicable. The fact that it is makes me wonder if we really are living in some hyper-intelligence's computer simulation.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-09 11:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-08 11:07 pm (UTC)The 3 guys who sit near me at work agree, thereby proving the geekiness.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-09 11:50 am (UTC)Glad you liked it.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-09 10:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-09 11:49 am (UTC)