How do you negotiate with crazy people?
Mar. 24th, 2010 10:57 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
- 67 percent of Republicans (and 40 percent of Americans overall) believe that Obama is a socialist.
- 57 percent of Republicans (32 percent overall) believe that Obama is a Muslim
- 45 percent of Republicans (25 percent overall) agree with the Birthers in their belief that Obama was "not born in the United States and so is not eligible to be president"
- 38 percent of Republicans (20 percent overall) say that Obama is "doing many of the things that Hitler did"
- Scariest of all, 24 percent of Republicans (14 percent overall) say that Obama "may be the Antichrist."
I mean, I know a lot of, say, Conservatives in the UK have beliefs I don't agree with. But the vast majority of them, so far as I can tell, just have different experiences to me, and different opinions about how things should be organised. They don't believe that the leader of the oppositon is the fucking antichrist, or other things that can be disproved by 30 seconds with Google.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 11:09 am (UTC)You say, "Hey we have at least another nine months of a majority in both houses of Congress, so fuck you all, we are going to push our legislation through. If you'd like to be part of the process, fine, but if you are just going to say 'no' to everything we try to do, fuck off, we'll win anyway."
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 11:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 01:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 05:48 pm (UTC)I'll look at the proper methodology when I've time, but odds are it's wrong because it's taking the numbers from registered Repubs, which isn't the same thing as those who voted repub.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 11:17 am (UTC)... eating, sleeping, attending meetings, participating in the process of government, being commander in chief of his nation's armed forces, ...
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 11:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 11:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-25 04:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 11:40 am (UTC)Well, no.
Their idea of "political engagement" is different. They don't really care much who is in Washington as long as that person gets the hell off their lawn, in every sense. They aren't particularly interested in whether or not that person's a socialist, or a Muslim, or whatever. What seems like a really important distinction to us is irrelevant to them and it's not based on the same level of judgement. It's more like asking, "Is Tom Cruise a golfer?" Well, uh, I dunno. Don't have a clue, don't really care. Maybe? I'd probably tick a box marked "might be a golfer".
And the mainstream political discourse completely excludes them. It's all about "is this plan or that plan good for the nation". But most of them couldn't give a fuck about this or that plan - they don't want any plans at all, they want Washington to shut the hell up and stop giving them plans.
So when the few people who understand that, who speak to them, say, "Hell with these damn Washington politicans and their socialism", then, well, obviously that's who they'll listen to. "Socialism" is redefined to mean "Letting my neighbours use my lawn". "Facism" is redefined as "Telling me what to do with my lawn".
It's perfectly reasonable and I'm sure that if I lived in the South and had similar political priorities, I'd come out with some of the same kind of things.
Ok, so some of the antichrist stuff is harder to swallow.
But damn if I'm not fed up of this kind of "haha lol they so stupid" analysis of the voting priorities of those who have been identified as "Republican".
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 11:46 am (UTC)If people want to have a small government and think that voting Republican will get them it then they're merely completely ignorant of actual behaviour of the previous Republican administrations. If they want to believe blatant lies and idiocy then they deserve to be called on that.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 11:49 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 09:46 pm (UTC)No, sorry, you're wrong here. This is dead fucking serious to a lot of Americans. America has had exactly one President who wasn't a Protestant Christian, and we killed him, and I think it'll be a long time before we get another. Mitt Romney's religion (he's a Mormon) is a major factor in why he's unlikely to be run by the Republicans. Religion in American politics--religion in America, period!--matters in a way that you probably have trouble understanding on a visceral level. It is flat out not equivalent to "golfing" in the way that you wrote it off to be.
We're still fighting about whether evolution versus "God created it all" ought to be taught in our public schools because of religious beliefs. Ditto "abstinence only" sex education vs. education that actually teaches things, ditto whether or not pharmacists have a religious right to not dispense prescribed medicine that they have a religious objection to, ditto the place of homosexuals in society (second class citizen or "to be converted"?), ditto ad nauseum.
You asked in another comment whether or not, if you went into the US and asked people, you'd really find 14 out of a 100 people who said that President Obama "may be the Antichrist"?
The answer is: In some areas you'd find far fewer than that. In other areas you'd find it to be a widespread, hardheld conviction. Of course the same thing can be said in America about snakehandling, spontaneous healings, speaking in tongues, feng shui, the imminent Apocalypse, and people rising from the dead.
(no subject)
From:Do they really?
Date: 2010-03-24 11:41 am (UTC)Not necessarily crazy just wrongly informed
Date: 2010-03-24 11:43 am (UTC)2) and 3) they get told this by supposedly reputable sources. Our conservatives are equally lied to by The Daily mail, telegraph, etc.
4) Whilst not defending all of Hitler's policies in any way, as I understand it he did bring in policies to bring Germany out of the depression that were considered perfectly reasonable at the time. The issue is the extrapolation of 'bad man does good and bad things therefore anyone who does same good things will do same bad things' which is again down to media spin.
5) He might be, you never know...
Actually large numbers of the UK population believe easily disproved things on the EU, Immigration, Single Mothers, Climate Change, etc.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 12:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 12:16 pm (UTC)Is that a problem?
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 01:07 pm (UTC)> How do you negotiate with crazy people?
First you stop calling them crazy and understand the context.
Then you find common ground and work from that. Most people are angry at the control that big business has over Congress. Common ground, excellent, get together on opposing lobbyists. I think that's one of the biggest deals at the moment and I don't understand why the Left isn't hand in hand with the Tea Party movement protesting it together.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 01:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 03:56 pm (UTC)Uh no, that was George W. Bush. Cheney is an archduke from Hell.
Seriously.
;)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 04:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 06:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 07:49 pm (UTC)In fact, on one point, "38 percent of Republicans (20 percent overall) say that Obama is "doing many of the things that Hitler did", if asked that question about Shrub, I would have responded yes in the sense that I saw a whole lot of proto-fascism in his rhetoric and his policies.
What's different here are several points. First off all, many of these people are confusing facts (claims about Obama being a Muslim or not a US citizen) with opinion, and also while I know a whole lot of people who (like myself) believe that Shrub was the worst US president in a century, believing that Obama may be the anti-christ is a seriously greater level of distrust and dislike than any but a tiny fringe of nutty leftists.
So, what I mostly see is a combination of several factors:
Far greater numbers of people oppose Obama than opposed Shrub, which is clearly driven by the fact that the far-right has a much larger mass media presence that the far left.
The people have a strong tendency to confuse facts and opinions.
Many of these people feel a level of hatred and fear regarding Obama that is substantially greater than any but an exceptionally tiny number of people felt about Shrub.
The result of these three factors means that these people's ideas are self-reinforcing, they are largely impervious to reason, and there a far greater likelihood that some of them are going to get violent. Combine this with the obvious racism, homophobia, and similar hatreds common to many, or perhaps most of these people, and the odds of violence are even higher. In short, these people scare me.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 11:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-25 04:53 am (UTC)Do they know where John McCain was born?
(And, yes, Senator McCain was quite eligible to be President.)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 02:35 pm (UTC)