I have no particular interest in Blu-ray at the moment. I don't feel the need to rebuy all my old DVDs, and in fact tend to watch movies via VoD or download at the moment anyway. (Or at the cinema). And the quality improvements didn't really seem worthwhile, until I saw this review of the Zulu Blu-ray. Scroll 2/3 of the way down and see the difference in quality between the various DVD transfers and the Blu-Ray one.
Still, I'm not about to rush out and buy one - but when the current DVD player finally dies, if the LOTR extended Blu-rays are finally out, then I could be tempted to upgrade...
Still, I'm not about to rush out and buy one - but when the current DVD player finally dies, if the LOTR extended Blu-rays are finally out, then I could be tempted to upgrade...
no subject
Date: 2009-12-05 05:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-05 05:51 pm (UTC)-- Steve may be getting a BluRay player next year, oddly enough a gift from the office as a memento to mark his 10 years' anniversary with the company.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-05 06:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-05 06:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-05 06:53 pm (UTC)That said, sorely tempted to buy the Zulu bluray disk. It's my favourite film in the world ever and I've already got it in VHS and DVD, might as well get it in bluray too!
no subject
Date: 2009-12-05 09:12 pm (UTC)I want to make an icon of that firing line shot. Excessive?
no subject
Date: 2009-12-05 11:15 pm (UTC)And yes, I assumed that first one was VHS at first, the quality is _awful_.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-05 11:25 pm (UTC)And that's from a film that was shot on 35mm stock. Imagine what you could get from true 70mm stuff.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-06 12:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-06 11:41 am (UTC)But I will almost certainly upgrade when the current DVD player dies.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-06 03:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-06 07:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-06 11:40 am (UTC)When compared to PAL in particular, NTSC color accuracy and consistency is considerably inferior, leading to video professionals and television engineers jokingly referring to NTSC as Never The Same Color, Never Twice the Same Color or No True Skin Colors
no subject
Date: 2009-12-06 09:30 am (UTC)You do know those are bollocks, right?
I mean they are certainly accurate and true, but our perception has so little to do with that sort of thing as it stands raw.
Take sound -- most telephones cut out a huge about of frequencies and we don't really notice. There's also a rule about how you can cut out all frequencies from a surprisingly low point and have absolutely no effect on perceived quality.
Same with jpegs. They chuck out swathes of information and our brains don't notice.
Friend of mine is doing research into this thing on video, which is all beyond me but I imagine along the same lines.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-06 11:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-06 11:40 am (UTC)Sorry, I got a case of TLDR there...
no subject
Date: 2009-12-07 03:24 pm (UTC)