Date: 2009-06-10 01:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sageautumn.livejournal.com
To be fair, it does appear they're making less in music, even compared to 2004 when it changed. (And a BIG difference than 1999)

Date: 2009-06-10 01:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bracknellexile.livejournal.com
Because we're all downloading music, are we then spending more of our disposable income elsewhere?

The only increase the last few years appears to be in games - presumably down to the rise of things like the Wii possibly coupled with a thought process of, "I could buy a couple of albums or buy a game. I'll download the albums," which would usually result in more money being spent overall if 2 albums = £20 and a game = £35-40.

Date: 2009-06-10 01:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bracknellexile.livejournal.com
So downloading is not reducing entertainment spending, just diverting it to different areas. Presumably if music downloading stopped, the overall expenditure wouldn't change much, it would just shift back to a bigger music share and a smaller games share.

I'm amazed the RIAA haven't tried to get money out of the games companies yet cos they'll probably feel they're entitled to it :)

Date: 2009-06-10 01:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bracknellexile.livejournal.com
True, but I'm not sure the cause-effect of "More games as a consequence of cheap/free music" as opposed to "Less music as a consequence of more attractive games" is paticularly clear-cut.

Date: 2009-06-10 01:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cairmen.livejournal.com
Would it? Bear in mind that there's plenty of illegal games downloading too...

Date: 2009-06-10 01:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bracknellexile.livejournal.com
Plenty, yes, but nowhere near as much I'd guess. Not sure where you'd find figures though - and even then the figures by data volume would be completely different to those by unit volume.

Date: 2009-06-10 03:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anton-p-nym.livejournal.com
I'm amazed the RIAA haven't tried to get money out of the games companies yet cos they'll probably feel they're entitled to it :)

RIAA hasn't, but some music studios have tried to renegotiate the royalty schemes... most especially on the Guitar Hero and Rock Band series.

-- Steve still does see file-sharing as a problem for media vendors, but doesn't think it can be banned out of the picture anymore than prohibition eliminated bathtub gin.

Date: 2009-06-10 01:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-pawson.livejournal.com
Not in music though. The graph is only upward because of the growth in games sales. The graph seems to show that music sales are shrinking year on year.

Date: 2009-06-10 02:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sageautumn.livejournal.com
Yes...

And also the ability to buy just one track of an album--say, for an MP3 player--can't be overlooked either.

Personally, I think most albums put out now are crap. With the exception of "greatest hits" (which takes, what... two hit songs on different albums for them to come out with now, and includes new music*)... ...most "albums" have only one or two decent songs.

Heaven knows how many times over I've bought Billy Joel's "The Stranger" or Bon Jovi's "Slippery When Wet"... because almost all of the songs are just as decent as the rest.

*which is a particular annoyance of mine... a greatest hits album should never have new stuff.. ..well, with the possible exception of if the entire band is dead.

Date: 2009-06-10 07:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] heron61.livejournal.com
Music sales appear to have grown (slightly) from 1999 to 2003. There is a significant decline from 2004 to 2008, but the rise in game sales well more than makes up for it. Given that disposal income is finite, it looks very much like people are spending so much on games that they have reduced their music purchases.

Date: 2009-06-10 10:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chuma.livejournal.com
This is going on the assumption that people would bother to buy these products if they didnt get to have them for free. Which is bollocks.

Date: 2009-06-10 10:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chuma.livejournal.com
Scratch that, I thought the figures were for money lost on media, not money spent.

August 2025

S M T W T F S
      1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 1314 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 2930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 30th, 2025 06:13 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios