I should just start commenting on myself.
Oct. 5th, 2007 12:36 pmI've noticed that people gather where the other people are.
A simple heuristic for "is something interesting" is "are other people interested in it?" - which means that if you are scrolling through your friends list, skim-reading the more interesting posts, that a post with 30 comments on it is more likely to get your attention than one sitting uncommented.
I've noticed this on occasion - a post will sit uncommented for _ages_ and then someone comments, and then someone else, and the more people comment the more likely it is to cause other people to join in. And then, of course, it falls off of people's friends pages, and the comments dry up.
I'm sure there's a paper in this somewhere.
A simple heuristic for "is something interesting" is "are other people interested in it?" - which means that if you are scrolling through your friends list, skim-reading the more interesting posts, that a post with 30 comments on it is more likely to get your attention than one sitting uncommented.
I've noticed this on occasion - a post will sit uncommented for _ages_ and then someone comments, and then someone else, and the more people comment the more likely it is to cause other people to join in. And then, of course, it falls off of people's friends pages, and the comments dry up.
I'm sure there's a paper in this somewhere.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-05 12:26 pm (UTC)People are interested in people. Who'd have guessed?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-05 02:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-05 02:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-05 07:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-05 02:43 pm (UTC)I only read the comments on this when they got up to 3 :)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-05 06:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-05 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-05 08:27 pm (UTC)I'm right more than I'm wrong.