Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Interesting Links for 03-09-2025
- 2: Interesting Links for 01-09-2025
- 3: Life with two kids: A matter of probability
- 4: Interesting Links for 29-08-2025
- 5: Interesting Links for 31-08-2025
- 6: Interesting Links for 26-08-2025
- 7: Interesting Links for 27-08-2025
- 8: Musical interlude with a room full of children
- 9: Photo cross-post
- 10: Interesting Links for 25-08-2025
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2007-09-10 10:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-11 12:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-11 06:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-11 08:06 am (UTC)"static pages" -> "pages generated in realtime" (i.e. database-backed content management systems like LJ)
"Web sites as separate islands" -> "web sites bringing data together from numerous places" (i.e. things like RSS and XML data exchange meaning your data isn't locked up on one site)
"Updates that require page refreshes" -> "pages that can update their data in situ" (i.e. things like Google Calendar where you can drag/drop your entries and it updates without having to interrupt you)
People coming at it from different directions talk about the social side of the web, but I figure that small amounts of that have been going on from the very beginning - it's just that we hit a critical mass of it only in 2002/3-ish that meant that you could start to assume you'd find people you knew online rather than the opposite.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-11 11:46 am (UTC)The consensus generally seems to be that web 3.0 is 3D / virtual world web 2.0.
In MIT I am told web 2.0 is SOOO last Tuesday.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-11 12:58 pm (UTC)(a)Virtual worlds are _not_ the web. They are other software also running on the internet.
(b)Who the hell wants to use a virtual world to buy a book, read LJ or listen to music?