andrewducker: (running lego man)
[personal profile] andrewducker
According to recent research published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, I've only a 50-50 chance of ascertaining the tone of any e-mail message. The study also shows that people think they've correctly interpreted the tone of e-mails they receive 90 percent of the time.


Or at least, so it says here.

So I'd like to apologise:

Firstly, to all the people whose emails, posts, comments, etc. that I've misinterpreted, misunderstood and generally reacted to in an inept way.  I ought to have more faith in you, and when it looks like you're acting badly I ought to at least check to make sure you're being serious before I assume that you're being a dick.

Secondly, to all those people who've failed to understand me.  I ought to be more aware of the medium in which I wrote, be clearer and leave less room for misunderstanding.

I hope you can forgive me.

Date: 2006-02-13 09:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnbobshaun.livejournal.com
I'd respond, but I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic or sincere.

Date: 2006-02-13 10:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] marrog.livejournal.com
Heh. This made me giggle.

...

Or did it?

Date: 2006-02-13 09:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] octopoid-horror.livejournal.com
You sick weirdo, get your damn perversions and blasphemies out of here!

*clever rejoinder, no?*

Date: 2006-02-13 10:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] surliminal.livejournal.com
Interestingly topical huh? I wish there was test we could take!"

I'm ALMOST sure you';re being ironic, just on the basis that public self abasement aren't exactly your style :-)

This is a poll, isn't it!

Date: 2006-02-15 07:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thishardenedarm.livejournal.com
I wish there was test we could take!"


you just took it. you failed.

Date: 2006-02-13 10:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kurosau.livejournal.com
Do you think telling people to fuck off could possibly be misinterpreted?

Date: 2006-02-16 12:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kurosau.livejournal.com
I should clarify. Although I was snarky that day, I wasn't saying that directly to [livejournal.com profile] andrewducker. I was just pointing out that it was an element of tone that couldn't be misinterpreted.

Date: 2006-02-13 11:08 pm (UTC)

Date: 2006-02-13 11:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thishardenedarm.livejournal.com
wow, everyone thinks you're being ironic. I think you totally mean it. Maybe I'm misunderstanding them. If nothing else this post is proving it's own point. Apology accepted and returned.

Date: 2006-02-14 05:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] i-ate-my-crusts.livejournal.com
I assume everything you say is both deadly serious and highly ironic. Then I get offended at your tone and reply defensively.

So I know you're only saying this to make me apologise for misreading you, and it won't work.

:p

Date: 2006-02-14 08:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oldbaldchris.livejournal.com
Only a wishy-washy liberal would ask forgiveness for this. Assuming this post is not a piss-take. Forgiven - people constantly misunderstand me anyway :)

Date: 2006-02-14 09:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] channelpenguin.livejournal.com
you takin' the piss, Ducker?

Date: 2006-02-14 10:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stillcarl.livejournal.com
Which 50% do you want us to forgive?

Date: 2006-02-16 12:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kurosau.livejournal.com
Please review my reply to [livejournal.com profile] 0olong. I realize that what I said might've sounded like I was saying 'fuck off' to you, which definately wasn't my intent.

Date: 2006-02-16 06:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kurosau.livejournal.com
Goes to show that my point may not have been as firm as I thought.

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 56 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22232425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 22nd, 2026 09:28 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios