Aaaaand, a quick apology
Feb. 13th, 2006 09:11 pmAccording to recent research published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, I've only a 50-50 chance of ascertaining the tone of any e-mail message. The study also shows that people think they've correctly interpreted the tone of e-mails they receive 90 percent of the time.
Or at least, so it says here.
So I'd like to apologise:
Firstly, to all the people whose emails, posts, comments, etc. that I've misinterpreted, misunderstood and generally reacted to in an inept way. I ought to have more faith in you, and when it looks like you're acting badly I ought to at least check to make sure you're being serious before I assume that you're being a dick.
Secondly, to all those people who've failed to understand me. I ought to be more aware of the medium in which I wrote, be clearer and leave less room for misunderstanding.
I hope you can forgive me.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 09:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 09:50 pm (UTC)*clever rejoinder, no?*
no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 10:08 pm (UTC)I'm ALMOST sure you';re being ironic, just on the basis that public self abasement aren't exactly your style :-)
This is a poll, isn't it!
no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 10:12 pm (UTC)...
Or did it?
no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 10:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 10:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 11:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 11:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-14 05:32 am (UTC)So I know you're only saying this to make me apologise for misreading you, and it won't work.
:p
no subject
Date: 2006-02-14 08:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-14 09:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-14 10:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-14 08:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 07:45 am (UTC)you just took it. you failed.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 12:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 12:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 09:55 am (UTC)Lucky guess, eh :->
no subject
Date: 2006-02-16 06:06 pm (UTC)