andrewducker: (headshot)
[personal profile] andrewducker
I just grabbed this for [livejournal.com profile] andyduckerlinks, but then was chatting to [livejournal.com profile] flickgc about it and wanted to talk about _why_ it scares me.

It's a photo (and close-ups of that photo) showing the original (of a model posing in a bikini) and the photoshopped version ("perfect" in every way).

When you switch back and forth you tend to go "Agh!" at seeing the version with all the pores, veins, etc.  But if you just leave it on that version for 30 seconds, or go away and come back to it, the model is actually rather pretty.  Certainly prettier than the vast majority of normal human beings (if your tastes go that way, of course).  It's only by comparison to the smoothed version that there's any feeling that this person isn't pretty.

It illustrates fantastically how surrounding ourselves with perfect robotic versions of beauty just leads to dissatisfaction, and spending all our time being presented with the images of hollywood babes just makes it harder to get on with our lives (where, no, you aren't going to get Brad Pitt/Johnny Depp, whoever's popular at the moment).

Re: Scary pictures

Date: 2005-04-09 02:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wolfieboy.livejournal.com
Just looking at the face, it looks to me like the photoshopped version is rendered rather than someone's actual face. People's faces just don't look like that.

Looking at the rest of them is instructive but not surprising. I'm amused that they had to make her tits larger...

Date: 2005-04-09 02:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lilitufire.livejournal.com
It's quite creepy in some ways. I mean, they even photoshopped her little blong belly hairs out!

Interesting.

Date: 2005-04-09 02:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lilitufire.livejournal.com
blonde even :)

Date: 2005-04-09 05:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] davidcook.livejournal.com
Amazing to see the lengths they go to. On the other hand, my impression of the unedited face is that she's spent too long in the sun working on her tan, and has the serious skin damage/aging to show for it.

Date: 2005-04-09 10:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] birdofparadox.livejournal.com
they do it to EVERYONE, though. I mean, on the Underworld movie poster, the first release of it had Kate Beckinsale (a lovely, though very tiny woman) with monster Marvel comics breasts.

She was utterly mortified: ~"you have to fix that, because people are going to watch the movie and be tremendously disappointed!"

Date: 2005-04-10 12:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] themongkey.livejournal.com
Ah, but then all the dissatisfied people go out and buy things to assuage their feelings of inadequacy, and thus keep the economy ticking.

Date: 2005-04-11 09:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] channelpenguin.livejournal.com
Too true. We compare and compete with what we see. (even if you don't personally want to play, nearly eveybody else is comparing *you* anyway, at least fleetingly/subconsciously)

Ageing does nasty job - it's harsh sometime to look at pics of yourself when younger/compare your image in the full length mirror with previous versions.

The effects of money and/or power aside), you tend to end up with a partner(s) about equally attractive as you are yourself - and your raw 'attactiveness rating' will *tend* to decline after a certain age - whilst your own taste may not keep up.

Damn! I'll just have to get rich and powerful :-)

Date: 2005-04-11 12:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wordofblake.livejournal.com
um, I didn't think *either* was pretty. The less airbrushed one looked older and like they were in a darkened room, but neither looked like someone I'd check out on the street

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
45 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 1415 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 2728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 28th, 2026 07:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios