Some thoughts on computing
Feb. 17th, 2005 07:52 pm1) What I've been up to
At some point in the last couple of weeks I was handed a copy of Lotus Notes Developer and told to make it forward email depending on the contents of the email, using a webservice (or two) to look up the necessary information. In Java. Having never coded anything for Lotus Notes, used Java or done anything similar before, this has kept me stuck in that fantastic limbo between fascinated and confused that is a steep learning curve.
2) An unlikely conclusion
I've also come to the conclusion that if someone I know wants a recommendation for a computer for checking their email and surfing the web on I'm going to tell them to buy a Mac Mini. Now, I don't have a Mac Mini, I've never used one, and frankly I didn't care much for OS X when I used it, but with the current state of adware, spyware, malware, viruses and miscellanious other evilness there is no way on God's earth that I'd recommend a PC to anyone who didn't need software that only ran on it. Personally, I'm happy to have one, I like the software options, the flexibility and the general ability to all sorts of fucking horrible things to it, but frankly it's not suitable for ordinary people who just want to do things without having to worry about the consequences.
It's like the difference between a Tivo, MCE and Sky+ ; Tivo's have a gorgeous interface and do one think exceptionally well, MCE is a general purpouse PC that does media things well and allows you to mess around with the results to a large degree, and Sky+ is a piece of shit that nevertheless keeps many, many customers happy enough to not actually go looking elsewhere. I'd never recommend Sky+ to people, but if they've already got it and aren't annoyed to death by it, then that's fine. I'd recommend a Tivo to anyone, but if you want the maximum amount of tweakability then you'll have bought MCE and be willing to face the idea that your video recorder can now get viruses.
You may notice that I haven't mentioned Linux (or any other unix-a-like) at all there. That's because frankly if you're a Linux person then you already know what you want, won't be asking for my advice and probably like recompiling kernels more than actually using the computer to do anything.
So, in conclusion - if you want to just check email I'm sure there's some kind of simple device that allows you to do so (personally I'm a fan of the Palm Tungsten series), if you want web, mail etc. in a usable computer-shaped box, get a Mac, and only buy a PC if there's actually a need for you to do so.
[Poll #439411]
At some point in the last couple of weeks I was handed a copy of Lotus Notes Developer and told to make it forward email depending on the contents of the email, using a webservice (or two) to look up the necessary information. In Java. Having never coded anything for Lotus Notes, used Java or done anything similar before, this has kept me stuck in that fantastic limbo between fascinated and confused that is a steep learning curve.
2) An unlikely conclusion
I've also come to the conclusion that if someone I know wants a recommendation for a computer for checking their email and surfing the web on I'm going to tell them to buy a Mac Mini. Now, I don't have a Mac Mini, I've never used one, and frankly I didn't care much for OS X when I used it, but with the current state of adware, spyware, malware, viruses and miscellanious other evilness there is no way on God's earth that I'd recommend a PC to anyone who didn't need software that only ran on it. Personally, I'm happy to have one, I like the software options, the flexibility and the general ability to all sorts of fucking horrible things to it, but frankly it's not suitable for ordinary people who just want to do things without having to worry about the consequences.
It's like the difference between a Tivo, MCE and Sky+ ; Tivo's have a gorgeous interface and do one think exceptionally well, MCE is a general purpouse PC that does media things well and allows you to mess around with the results to a large degree, and Sky+ is a piece of shit that nevertheless keeps many, many customers happy enough to not actually go looking elsewhere. I'd never recommend Sky+ to people, but if they've already got it and aren't annoyed to death by it, then that's fine. I'd recommend a Tivo to anyone, but if you want the maximum amount of tweakability then you'll have bought MCE and be willing to face the idea that your video recorder can now get viruses.
You may notice that I haven't mentioned Linux (or any other unix-a-like) at all there. That's because frankly if you're a Linux person then you already know what you want, won't be asking for my advice and probably like recompiling kernels more than actually using the computer to do anything.
So, in conclusion - if you want to just check email I'm sure there's some kind of simple device that allows you to do so (personally I'm a fan of the Palm Tungsten series), if you want web, mail etc. in a usable computer-shaped box, get a Mac, and only buy a PC if there's actually a need for you to do so.
[Poll #439411]
no subject
Date: 2005-02-17 07:57 pm (UTC)Is it just me, or is that faintly rude....?
no subject
Date: 2005-02-17 08:00 pm (UTC)However, I am now giggling like a 6-year-old.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-17 08:10 pm (UTC)*applauds*
no subject
Date: 2005-02-17 08:50 pm (UTC)As long as it's not just me....
no subject
Date: 2005-02-17 08:51 pm (UTC)Then again, on Tuesday, I figured out that 'High Fidelity' was called that because it was about relationships.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-17 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-17 10:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-17 10:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-17 11:08 pm (UTC)You're the best. :D
no subject
Date: 2005-02-17 08:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-17 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-17 08:10 pm (UTC)I liked my laptop with Redhat on it, that an ex configured for me, but I never got up the impetus to keep it updated. I keep that and a spare PC liberated from work as a backup.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-17 08:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-17 11:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-17 08:56 pm (UTC)If that's your reason for liking your PC, well, the same is true for the Mac. OSX is built on top of FreeBSD, so all the power you'd have to commit great acts of mayhem on a Unix or Linux box, you can have here too. Software? You can buy just about all the usual suspects (I hear games are still a weak spot) and there's all sorts of open-source software available for it as well.
I'm using my old blue-and-white G3 (with a new G4 processor) as my web and music server at home, and typing this on a PowerBook. My husband, who was a hard-core Linux user, now says he prefers to use the Mac.
(And for those who don't want to get that geeky, Macs make very nice home computers for checking email, playing your tunes, and storing your photos.)
no subject
Date: 2005-02-17 09:00 pm (UTC)When I look at things I actually need, they exist for the Mac as well.
Right now I'm greatly looking forward to Darwinia, so I'll have to stick to the PC for the moment.
http://www.darwinia.co.uk/about/screenshots.html
no subject
Date: 2005-02-17 11:08 pm (UTC)I really enjoyed Uplink, but this looks like it is a lot better.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-18 08:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-17 11:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-18 03:05 am (UTC)My conclusion is there's no computer you can recommend, we having reached the point where we can only offer the least-worst option.
Here's a simple question: Does the Mac Mini, out-of-the-box, automatically back up the data on its hard-drive so if its hard-drive dies the user won't have lost any of their data?
no subject
Date: 2005-02-18 10:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-18 10:54 am (UTC)I think everybody's missing this trick. Backing-up shouldn't be an add-on - it should be a part of every computer shipped, and ideally do it in triplicate, meaning to a second hard-drive in the computer and another-one elsewhere - should the computer be stolen - dropped in the bathtub...
no subject
Date: 2005-02-18 11:36 am (UTC)But I agree totally on this. When I say that Apple is missing a trick, I'm referring to the fact that their general philosophy seems to be to ship with the system nearly everything that the average computer user will need.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-18 02:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-18 05:41 pm (UTC)That thing you are currently staring at is a 'monitor'. The thing your fingers are near with the letters all over it is a 'keyboard'. The thing which, when you move it, makes the cursor move, is a 'mouse'.
The magical box they are all plugged into is a 'computer'.
Next week: Advanced compiler optimisation techniques.
Re: kernels
Date: 2005-02-19 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-24 06:52 pm (UTC)