There was a discussion on Slashdot about where the following was said:
Person 1:
Who's hyping anything? HL2 is better than sex.
(And yes, I've had sex. In meatspace. With a female. A human female. But my PC was also in the room, and I was able to get some coding done after she fell asleep, so I don't have to turn in my geek card just yet.)
Person 2:
If you think that a FPS is better than sex you are not fucking correctly.
Person 3 (responding to person 2):
Sex is boring, the only reason I give into my body's incessant desires to fuck (women, yes just women) is because if I don't my body makes me feel depressed/inadequate.
Sex is mostly only good for girls as far as I can tell. The whole-skin sensitivity thing is a bit good by the look of it, as well as having more erogenous zones, and they get all the foreplay too.
I prefer programming and computer games quite often actually, although ocassionaly sex is really good and I do confess, that is hard to beat. But usually that kind of sex requires a lot of booze, and anyway, like everything else in this world stuff gets boring eventually, and sex is basically just in and out with some grunting.
Which brings the whole 'better than sex' thing to mind. I like sex - it's fun. But I've never really understood the whole 'sex is better than everything' idea. Every so often the urge for sex is fairly overwhelming, but it's not this mind-numbingly amazing thing that overrides everything else.
Anyone care to explain it to me?
[Poll #385756]
Person 1:
Who's hyping anything? HL2 is better than sex.
(And yes, I've had sex. In meatspace. With a female. A human female. But my PC was also in the room, and I was able to get some coding done after she fell asleep, so I don't have to turn in my geek card just yet.)
Person 2:
If you think that a FPS is better than sex you are not fucking correctly.
Person 3 (responding to person 2):
Sex is boring, the only reason I give into my body's incessant desires to fuck (women, yes just women) is because if I don't my body makes me feel depressed/inadequate.
Sex is mostly only good for girls as far as I can tell. The whole-skin sensitivity thing is a bit good by the look of it, as well as having more erogenous zones, and they get all the foreplay too.
I prefer programming and computer games quite often actually, although ocassionaly sex is really good and I do confess, that is hard to beat. But usually that kind of sex requires a lot of booze, and anyway, like everything else in this world stuff gets boring eventually, and sex is basically just in and out with some grunting.
Which brings the whole 'better than sex' thing to mind. I like sex - it's fun. But I've never really understood the whole 'sex is better than everything' idea. Every so often the urge for sex is fairly overwhelming, but it's not this mind-numbingly amazing thing that overrides everything else.
Anyone care to explain it to me?
[Poll #385756]
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 11:32 am (UTC)It's best, IMHO, when the emotions are involved as well as the flesh.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 11:43 am (UTC)I agree with this. And as for the responder to that who thought sex was better for women than men, chrissakes, get some imagination... just because you're a man doesn't mean you have to conform to the stick-it-in done-in-5-minutes model of sex.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 11:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 12:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 03:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 11:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-17 06:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-17 06:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 12:01 pm (UTC)There's nothing else in the world that I have discovered that quite captures the extremity of pleasure of an orgasm, and a self-induced one is never as good. However, there are some things that are not nearly as intense that sustain a very high level of pleasure for a long time, which is both rare and hard work in sex: for me, riding a motorcycle on good interesting empty country roads on a clear sunny day is probably the next best thing.
best things.
Date: 2004-11-16 12:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 12:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 02:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 02:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 03:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 04:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-17 12:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 02:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-17 02:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 03:30 pm (UTC)I thought people only used that word in Neal Stephenson and William Gibson books?
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 03:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 03:35 pm (UTC)Something I want to know is, other than the emotional factor, what difference is there in the pleasure people get from sex vs masturbation? Why do people want to fuck other people as opposed to doing it themself? How is it different? Is it just the emotional factor?... Is it getting extra pleasure from pleasing someone else besides yourself? Is it the esteem-boost from having someone think you're attractive enough to have sex with? Or is it physically somehow very different?
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 03:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-17 02:24 am (UTC)5 decent wanks = 1 mediocre shag
no subject
Date: 2004-11-17 02:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-17 02:32 pm (UTC)Personally, I find that masturbation is about as effective as real sex.
Real sex is usually more fun though.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-17 02:46 pm (UTC)As did I, although possibly not to quite the extreme extent of Waterhouse. It can definitely get in the way, though.
Personally, I find that masturbation is about as effective as real sex.
Nah, the real thing definitely wins over here.
I almost can't believe I'm having this conversation.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 03:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 03:46 pm (UTC)as for your enthusiasm for HL2, which I have no clue what kind of game it even is, other than I assume the name stands for "Half-Life 2", and although I therefore obviously don't share your enthusiasm for it, nevertheless, I think it's great that you are enthusiastic. if it's fun, enjoy it, by golly, and certainly get up early to play it, even if you're sick, because, by golly, feeling enthusiastic about something is fun and you might as well have fun, because it's better than not having fun. yep!
no subject
Date: 2004-11-16 07:07 pm (UTC)Don't feel stupid. It took me the longest time to figure that one, myself. :)
Aw shucks..
Date: 2004-11-17 05:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-17 12:01 am (UTC)And yes, am having lots of fun.
You can get an idea what it looks like here:
http://www.3dgamers.com/games/halflife2/screenshots/
no subject
Date: 2004-11-17 02:12 am (UTC)However, if I was feeling particularly reductionist and ignoring things like love, respect, a sense of fun/danger, etc, then sex could be modelled as an intermittent necessity like, say, food.
When you're starving then bread and water is the best thing ever.
Much of the time a decent meal once a day is adequate and satisfying but not the best thing ever.
Every so often, though, you need to go out and experience something really tasty and exotic. Could be the best thing ever. Or just the worst.
And, of course, there are some foods that you just don't like or don't care to sample.
Just to take the edge off things, we all need a quick snack-off-the-wrist from time to time.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-17 04:15 pm (UTC)http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/science/10/14/asexual.study/
and
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99996533
no subject
Date: 2004-11-17 06:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-17 07:36 pm (UTC)