So - for non-techheads - the time it tokk for the mail to get sent on the older (patched) version was more than the time the guy had set as the time for a positive response from the destination, so it read everything that needed that time to travel that far as failed? yes?
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2003-10-29 12:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-10-29 02:54 am (UTC)Actually, yes.
no subject
Date: 2003-10-29 06:25 pm (UTC)