Interesting Links for 21-12-2025
Dec. 21st, 2025 12:00 pm- 1. Transgender kids change their minds only 6% of the time
- (tags:LGBT transgender children psychology )
- 2. A train-sized tunnel is now carrying electricity under South London
- (tags:electricity infrastructure tunnels London UK )
- 3. AI Chatbots Are Poisoning Research Archives With Fake Citations
- (tags:AI research doom OhForFucksSake )
- 4. Italian bears living near villages have evolved to be smaller and less aggressive
- (tags:bears evolution )
- 5. Santa Claus is still a woman
- (tags:presents christmas women patriarchy society )
no subject
Date: 2025-12-21 12:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-12-21 12:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-12-21 12:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-12-21 12:28 pm (UTC)I wonder how long the beard will last
no subject
Date: 2025-12-21 01:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-12-21 02:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-12-21 03:49 pm (UTC)Thus research to identify those who might or wont detransition would be useful, so that some could skip blockers and go straight to active treatments.
Is that not what Cass recommended ?
It is unfortunate that the poor state of care for (possibly or likely) trans children in the UK means that the effect of the Cass report has been to stop all blockers.
Of course this is 6% of those who socially transition, which will not include those who explore but don't reach that point.
no subject
Date: 2025-12-21 03:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-12-21 03:55 pm (UTC)Treatments that encourage transition???
no subject
Date: 2025-12-21 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-12-21 04:21 pm (UTC)There always have been those who explore but don't ever fully transition even after experimenting with blockers and I see nothing wrong with that.
I'm of a generation where blockers in the teens were simply not an option and the harm that the 'wrong ' puberty does and the damage that needs to then be undone is something I can speak to personally.
no subject
Date: 2025-12-21 04:35 pm (UTC)I have only looked at the Cass report, not read it.
However, in the long radio interview she gave, she recommended blockers where appropriate, but the need for research was so great that she recommended that all such treatment should be part of research.
I am aware that there is lots of research that blockers help many people, and that that seems to have been missed/ignored by the Cass report (and especially by the research survey group it relied upon), but I got the impression that she genuinely wanted to know who they helped and whether it was possibly to identify those who could go straight to more active treatment.
The effect of the Cass report is no treatment for anyone, but I do not believe that that was her intent.
no subject
Date: 2025-12-21 04:39 pm (UTC)Can you phrase it better ?
no subject
Date: 2025-12-21 08:07 pm (UTC)"This means that clinicians cannot go straight to treatments which encourage transition without risking harm to some."
I'd go with "support".
And gender-affirming is generally treatment to support transition, as the phrase is mostly used to affirm the gender the person wishes to present as.
(It can be used for people who are present and identify in the same direction, but want to identify moreso - because they struggle to grow a moustache, or they grow breasts they don't want. But I rarely see the phrase used in that context.)
no subject
Date: 2025-12-21 08:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-12-21 08:27 pm (UTC)Ah, gotcha. I'm not sure I have a simple differentiator between those!
no subject
Date: 2025-12-22 10:16 am (UTC)