andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2025-05-13 12:29 pm (UTC)
channelpenguin: (Default)
From: [personal profile] channelpenguin
3. not unexpected. so basically continuous glicose montitoring is probably useless for healthy people.
4. well, yes. Care is and will be hugely hit. I feel no countrty is prepared for a bigger and sicker elderly population.
5. good news!
11. power to the people!
13. Intriguing. Plausible.
14. ha!

Date: 2025-05-13 01:00 pm (UTC)
channelpenguin: (Default)
From: [personal profile] channelpenguin
at least repeated bouts of covid will mean that we might all die off a decade sooner! Win!

Date: 2025-05-13 01:35 pm (UTC)
mountainkiss: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mountainkiss
My main learning from wearing a CGM is how little the macronutrient balance of my diet affects my blood sugar level when compared to my sleep and stress levels.

Date: 2025-05-13 02:27 pm (UTC)
mountainkiss: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mountainkiss

Unusual in what way?

Date: 2025-05-13 02:46 pm (UTC)
mountainkiss: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mountainkiss

This one has a pre-diabetes figure of just over one in ten for the UK.

Date: 2025-05-13 03:02 pm (UTC)
mountainkiss: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mountainkiss

Yes but the causality is stronger in the other direction. Most people with pre-diabetes also have insulin resistance (just before reference 9). So perhaps the initial reading was more accurate - that it is less usual to have insulin resistance that doesn’t develop into pre-diabetes over a long period. But insulin resistance per se is not rare, I think.

Date: 2025-05-13 03:35 pm (UTC)
calimac: (JRRT)
From: [personal profile] calimac
1) I'd like to endorse this reading of Tolkien. The author seems to me to have a good understanding of how Tolkien's created world works. The one note I would make is that the concentration on Gandalf's power tends to overshadow a point that's only emphasized near the end, that Gandalf mostly operates without expressing direct power on the enemy but by encouraging and boosting the Free Peoples. Thus, with Theoden he offers him a free choice between continuing to be lured by the webs of Grima or to shake himself free and come into the light. Theoden has to do this himself; Gandalf offers him the opportunity and the encouragement to do it.

That is why the scene is so wrong in Jackson's movie. There, Theoden is under a spell of Saruman's - he's forced into submission, not lured of his own will by words - and Gandalf breaks that spell by force, instead of giving Theoden the chance to free himself.

And then what does Theoden do? In the movie, the newly freed Theoden suddenly succumbs to fear and runs off to Helm's Deep to hide. Whereas Tolkien's Theoden also goes to Helm's Deep, but for the positive reason that it's the most defensible point to offer battle to the enemy. Jackson has completely distorted the story.

Date: 2025-05-13 06:18 pm (UTC)
calimac: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calimac
This manifests itself as almost everyone in the movie suffering a failure of nerve which is completely out of character as well as uncanonical. Then they have to climb awkwardly out of it, with even less explanation, to get the story back on the rails. The prime example is Faramir, inexplicably deciding to seize the Ring, and then even more inexplicably changing his mind. But there are many others.

Date: 2025-05-13 08:40 pm (UTC)
calimac: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calimac
I think it's best to look at these as a combination of 'in themselves' and 'as an adaptation of the book.' Thus, the reason J-Faramir sends Frodo off is -because- Jackson needs to get the plot back on the rails for the story to continue. But he can't think of an internal, story-based reason for Faramir to do this, so that's why it's inexplicable and ridiculous.

What doesn't occur to Jackson is that everything he wants to do would result in a story entirely different from The Lord of the Rings if not forcibly stopped from doing so, so maybe he should stop thinking that he knows better than Tolkien how to tell Tolkien's story.

Date: 2025-05-13 06:05 pm (UTC)
movingfinger: (Default)
From: [personal profile] movingfinger
I was both unsurprised and disappointed that Peter Jackson's take on LotR missed out entirely on the deep underpinnings. I suppose it is predictable that he would go for the surface-level ripping adventure story, but the movies missed a huge part of the story by not picking up on the deeper worldbuilding callouts and callbacks that happen throughout the action of the Lord of the Rings narrative.

And, yes, strongly agree that Jackson's portrayal of Theoden would not make Jackson popular in Rohan!

Date: 2025-05-14 10:43 am (UTC)
simont: A picture of me in 2016 (Default)
From: [personal profile] simont
This notion of the LotR magic makes a lot of sense, but I was a little disappointed that it seemed slightly incompatible with "Frodo laid a geas" (previous link post, source material). This article reckons that the Rings of Power have to be commanded in the right language, whereas the other one reckons Frodo commanded the One Ring in whatever language he happened to feel like.

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 15th, 2025 05:25 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios