5

Date: 2024-11-19 12:28 pm (UTC)
danieldwilliam: (Default)
From: [personal profile] danieldwilliam
I am of the view that the hybrid war is not possible, it's actual but we haven't realised we are in it yet.

Re: 5

Date: 2024-11-19 03:05 pm (UTC)
channelpenguin: (Default)
From: [personal profile] channelpenguin
agreed

3

Date: 2024-11-19 12:31 pm (UTC)
danieldwilliam: (Default)
From: [personal profile] danieldwilliam
Very much so. They are a tool for understanding how people currently feel. They have some limitations at this job. They can also be useful for predicting how people will feel and behave in the future but they bring their existing limitations and some others to that job.

People should not be surprised that they have been surprised by an unexpected outcome from using a tool the wrong way.

Date: 2024-11-19 01:51 pm (UTC)
autopope: Me, myself, and I (Default)
From: [personal profile] autopope

Wrt. the Baltic cables, this is nothing new in warfare: most of the intercontinental undersea telegraph cables had to be re-layed or repaired after the first world war (and again, after the second) because everybody went on a cable-cutting spree targeting their enemies.

I'll be more worried if Russia starts lobbing ASAT weapons at Starlink or NATO communications satellites in LEO. (Risk of a deliberate Kessler cascade being engineered by Russia, on the threshold of losing their ability to maintain a space industry so no more shits left to give: non-zero.)

Date: 2024-11-19 03:05 pm (UTC)
channelpenguin: (Default)
From: [personal profile] channelpenguin
I think there are ONLY terrible times for that!

Date: 2024-11-19 04:51 pm (UTC)
hilarita: stoat hiding under a log (Default)
From: [personal profile] hilarita
The times for that are terrible and, astonishingly, even more terrible.

And I agree with [personal profile] autopope - we've been doing hybrid warfare for at least a century now. Attacking communication and supply lines (especially supply lines) has been part of warfare for a very long time. It's been interesting that it's relatively quiet on the cyber front at the moment; though maybe Russia aren't saying much, and neither are Ukraine in case Russia gets wise to what they're doing.

Actually, Russia may be holding off on deliberate Kessler cascade because China have a bunch of moon missions on at the moment, and maybe they're not wanting to piss them off that much.

Date: 2024-11-19 04:54 pm (UTC)
hilarita: stoat hiding under a log (Default)
From: [personal profile] hilarita
3. Yes. That does seem to me a much clearer visualisation of how close things really are.
6. Hooray! I am all for a low-cost intervention that improves this, and isn't a way to bully the bully (by staff being heavy-handed, especially towards Black kids) or a way to bully the bullied more ("you must have provoked them! Stand up for yourself (which of course then tends to land the bullied kid in more trouble for retaliation)! Just ignore it...")

Date: 2024-11-19 06:43 pm (UTC)
bens_dad: (Default)
From: [personal profile] bens_dad
5. Undersea cables and pipelines.

I recently read something about the German ammunition dumps rusting in the Baltic and wondered whether they could have had anything to do with the gas pipeline breaches a year or two back.

(I am not saying that I don't think the Russians are up to anything, just that there may be other possibilities).

Date: 2024-11-20 05:42 am (UTC)
channelpenguin: (Default)
From: [personal profile] channelpenguin
I wonder if undersea cable cutting is at least partly for intimidation. It was specifically lines to Finland, right? And it's going to be very obvious when the repair crews get there if it was sabotage. I wonder that because there are many more ways to sabotage comms than damaging hard to reach cabling, and a lot of them would be far harder to detect. So maybe it's more "you're next Finland" than anything else. (Which could also be a bluff of course to divert attention from some other move)

There are regular controlled explosions carried out in the Baltic (or Die Ostsee, as we call it here). I'm 30 km away and very occasionally we hear them!

Date: 2024-11-19 07:23 pm (UTC)
drplokta: (Default)
From: [personal profile] drplokta
The summary “Only farms worth more than £3m will be taxed” is over-simplified to the point of falsehood. Only farms worth more than £3m will be taxed, provided they were jointly owned by a married couple who are leaving them to their children, they include a house worth at least £350,000, and the estate contained no other assets at all. Which is to say, that supposed £3 million will never apply in practice.

My own solution for this is that inheritance tax should be deferred rather than waived on family homes, family businesses and family farms. You can keep living in the house, running the business or running the farm for as long as you want, but when you do eventually sell it the government gets its share. If it’s inherited again before it’s sold, the government’s share increases.

That fits in well with the change to targeting public sector net financial liabilities instead of net borrowing, because the government’s deferred shares would be financial assets and so would be netted off against debt.

Date: 2024-11-19 08:57 pm (UTC)
mountainkiss: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mountainkiss
This polling article is not arrant nonsense.

Date: 2024-11-20 12:47 pm (UTC)
danieldwilliam: (Default)
From: [personal profile] danieldwilliam
What do you think is wrong with the polling article?

Date: 2024-11-20 12:48 pm (UTC)
mountainkiss: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mountainkiss

This one, nothing.

Date: 2024-11-20 12:50 pm (UTC)
danieldwilliam: (Default)
From: [personal profile] danieldwilliam
I'm a little confused now.

Date: 2024-11-20 12:56 pm (UTC)
mountainkiss: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mountainkiss

I think that’s because you’re misreading what I’ve written.

Date: 2024-11-20 01:27 pm (UTC)
danieldwilliam: (Default)
From: [personal profile] danieldwilliam
Ah, so I am.

April 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 2223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 07:08 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios