Date: 2024-04-29 12:12 pm (UTC)
cmcmck: (Default)
From: [personal profile] cmcmck
5. Quelle surprise

Date: 2024-04-29 01:00 pm (UTC)
dewline: "Truth is still real" (anti-fascism)
From: [personal profile] dewline
Indeed.

I am full of reactions today, apparently

Date: 2024-04-29 03:07 pm (UTC)
misbegotten: A skull wearing a crown with text "Uneasy lies the head" (Default)
From: [personal profile] misbegotten
1. I'm not sure why they don't just book her ticket putting her age as 99. I mean, if the data is going to be incorrect anyway...

2. Oh my word. How awful.

3. Another funding issue. Sigh.

Re: I am full of reactions today, apparently

Date: 2024-04-29 03:17 pm (UTC)
misbegotten: A skull wearing a crown with text "Uneasy lies the head" (Default)
From: [personal profile] misbegotten
Right, but clearly she's not 1 year old and she's getting through security with THAT.

Re: I am full of reactions today, apparently

Date: 2024-04-29 06:02 pm (UTC)
foms: (Default)
From: [personal profile] foms
I worry about this happening to me. The travel agency that my job requires also requires date of birth to have any account with them. Official response to my challenge that I must not provide that information (and they must not ask -- as was the set-up of the previous iteration of their system) until and unless I am in the act of purchasing a travel ticket for a destination outside of this country has, so far, been: lie.

I have not yet had to travel at all using this system but, if I do use air travel, again, they won't even make any statement about whether the information in the date of birth field may be transmitted to an airline for domestic destinations.

Once I give them the information, it's theirs, forever.

Also: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2022/06/__trashed-2.html

Date: 2024-04-29 06:19 pm (UTC)
wildeabandon: picture of me (Default)
From: [personal profile] wildeabandon
I'd be quite concerned about 4 unless it were limited to lies that relate to their jobs or campaigns. Politicians have as much of a right to personal privacy as anyone else, and where a refusal to answer will lead to harmful speculation I think it's perfectly legitimate to lie in response to questions about things that are none of the public's damn business (I'm thinking about things like health or medical history, family life, sexuality, and so on, because those are the things I want the option of keeping private, but there are probably a whole bunch of other things I haven't thought of.)

Date: 2024-04-29 08:52 pm (UTC)
bens_dad: (Default)
From: [personal profile] bens_dad
I don't think that they should be allowed to lie about *anything* in a press conference or on the record in Parliament etc.

"Did you sleep with X ?" and "When did you sell your house ?" are personal questions but *sometimes* they are politically significant.

I am not suggesting that they have to *answer* these questions, so the press would have to accept that ... which would require a change in press culture.

Perhaps we are talking about a "White lie" defence ?

Date: 2024-04-29 07:36 pm (UTC)
kerk_hiraeth: Me and Unidoggy Edinburgh Pride 2015 (Default)
From: [personal profile] kerk_hiraeth
Good luck defining a lie...

kerk

Date: 2024-04-30 05:59 am (UTC)
bens_dad: (Default)
From: [personal profile] bens_dad
3 I was surprised and annoyed to discover that political ads are not covered by the Advertising Standards Authority.

Date: 2024-04-30 06:50 am (UTC)
bens_dad: (Default)
From: [personal profile] bens_dad
I concluded that the ASA budget would need to be increased substantially to allow them to police political ads.

April 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 2223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 06:26 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios