Page Summary
Active Entries
- 1: Interesting Links for 16-03-2026
- 2: What books did Terry Pratchett find inspirational?
- 3: Life with two children: Gideon updates
- 4: Interesting Links for 15-03-2026
- 5: Interesting Links for 10-03-2026
- 6: Photo cross-post
- 7: Interesting Links for 14-03-2026
- 8: Interesting Links for 13-03-2026
- 9: I need to know when it's okay to tell your partner you love them
- 10: Interesting Links for 11-03-2026
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2024-02-04 12:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2024-02-04 12:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2024-02-04 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2024-02-04 07:31 pm (UTC)But council tax bands - based on 1990 valuations (at least, it is in England; Wales has revalued a couple of times, and writing this has made me aware I have no idea whether Scotland has revalued or not) and with limited bands which now bear no reality to the actual property value - mean the system is deeply flawed.
Personally I think a property tax of a fixed percentage of the value would make sense.
But London properties - valued much higher than most of the country - would be taxed less. Maybe some redistribution, too?
Well, I can dream...
no subject
Date: 2024-02-05 11:50 am (UTC)With the caveat that there might be an arguement that existing tenants are only tenants because they are lucky to have been allocated existing social housing and that the people who will be housed in the newly built social housing are just as deserving and just as in need as existing tenants. So if we are going to restrict building social housing we ought to ballot both current social tenants and potential social tenants and evict existing tenants in favour of qualifying potential tenants.
no subject
Date: 2024-02-05 11:44 am (UTC)Two bees, or not two bees
Date: 2024-02-05 07:06 am (UTC)Re: Two bees, or not two bees
Date: 2024-02-05 07:25 am (UTC)