Date: 2023-09-01 12:39 pm (UTC)

1) Pratchett

Date: 2023-09-01 01:48 pm (UTC)
danieldwilliam: (Default)
From: [personal profile] danieldwilliam
I'm a big Pratchett fan but I think I'm not sad that his work in progress won't see the light of day.

I personally did not enjoy his later books as much as I enjoyed his mid or mid-late period books. I've never been sure if that was a change in his focus, a change in my tastes or the impact on his writing of his disease.

My guess is that his latter work in progress would not have been amoungst my favourites of his works had it been published.

Re: 1) Pratchett

Date: 2023-09-01 03:21 pm (UTC)
danieldwilliam: (Default)
From: [personal profile] danieldwilliam
Yeah, definately with you on Unseen Academicals. IIRC correctly I quite liked Thud! but it's been so long since I read it that I can't remember.

Re: 1) Pratchett

Date: 2023-09-02 04:30 am (UTC)
channelpenguin: (Default)
From: [personal profile] channelpenguin
Now I broadly agree ... But I love Thud and think it's 100% "in style", just ... darker.. and I am so so on Night Watch (but I have a dislike of time travel stories)

Re: 1) Pratchett

Date: 2023-09-08 05:40 pm (UTC)
poshmerchant: (Default)
From: [personal profile] poshmerchant
I love Thud! and Making Money, am meh on Unseen Academicals, like Snuff, but hard bounced off Raising Steam
Edited Date: 2023-09-08 05:40 pm (UTC)

Date: 2023-09-01 03:36 pm (UTC)
flemmings: (Default)
From: [personal profile] flemmings

See, I liked Unseen Academicals and Thud. Raising Steam was the one I struggled with, and still do. But the sadness about Pratchett's WIPs is that some were started way back before the embuggerance took hold. You can see it in the beginning of The Shepherd's Crown, which is prime Pratchett.

Pretty sure Rhianna wouldn't have let Rob renege anyway, but sheesh. They're printing his (sorta) juvenilia now. Couldn't they have spared us some fragments?

Date: 2023-09-01 07:34 pm (UTC)
calimac: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calimac
Authors have varying opinions on what's to be done with their literary leftovers. Tolkien wanted the Silmarillion published, though he might have been surprised by the form his posthumous works have taken. With some authors, the genius lies mostly in the final polishing, and unfinished works of theirs that have been published are somewhat disappointing. Both P.G. Wodehouse and Gustav Mahler fall in that category, and I wouldn't be surprised if Pratchett thought the same of himself, which could explain his 'destroy it all' instructions.

But you know what author instructed his executors to destroy his unpublished work, and they ignored this and published it, and it's most of what he's now best-known for?

Franz Kafka.

Date: 2023-09-02 04:34 am (UTC)
channelpenguin: (Default)
From: [personal profile] channelpenguin
Agreed, even though it makes me very sad in some cases where you KNOW they are perfectionists and that their unfinished works would STILL be better than 90% of most finished stuff (in the music arena - PRINCE!!) .

Date: 2023-09-02 01:23 pm (UTC)
cathrowan: (Default)
From: [personal profile] cathrowan
That thread about Bessie Watson is amazing. Thanks so much for linking to it.

Date: 2023-09-02 05:46 pm (UTC)
hairyears: Spilosoma viginica caterpillar: luxuriant white hair and a 'Dougal' face with antennae. Small, hairy, and venomous (Default)
From: [personal profile] hairyears
Wot dey sed.

That's an amazing life story.
anef: (Default)
From: [personal profile] anef
I first read this as "Neil Gaiman (almost inadvertently) prevented Terry Pratchett's unfinished work from being steamrolled" and was puzzled when I read the article. Then I realised that you meant "Neil Gaiman almost (inadvertently) prevented Terry Pratchett's unfinished work from being steamrolled".

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
45 678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 7th, 2026 05:00 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios