Date: 2023-07-14 03:42 pm (UTC)
calimac: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calimac
1. It doesn't mean much in a practical sense, as most prisoners in the US are in state prisons, and Biden has no authority over those. But it sure is important symbolically.

4. This just makes me more exasperated at my brother, who's using ChatGPT as if it were an oracle to answer philosophical conundrums of the "Can God make a rock too heavy for him to lift?" sort. And then he sends me the transcripts. By this point I'm just deleting them unread.

5. At last, an article that actually references the movie that immediately comes to mind when reading it.

7. And people blame the shutdown on the actors who went on strike. Why not blame the studios who insisted on these awful things?

Date: 2023-07-15 03:38 am (UTC)
channelpenguin: (Default)
From: [personal profile] channelpenguin
Gosh, are people really doing that? :-(.

It's a computer program not an oracle.

Date: 2023-07-14 04:22 pm (UTC)
ckd: small blue foam shark (Default)
From: [personal profile] ckd

Item 5 had to reference the movie, since the book didn't use an MHD propulsion system but rather a ducted impeller sort of thing.

Date: 2023-07-14 04:27 pm (UTC)
calimac: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calimac
I was thinking of a previous article about space debris impacting satellites, that said nothing about the movie Gravity.

Date: 2023-07-15 03:39 am (UTC)
channelpenguin: (Default)
From: [personal profile] channelpenguin
Maybe because the submarine movie is MUCH better than the space one?.:-)

Date: 2023-07-15 05:06 am (UTC)
calimac: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calimac
Really?

Gravity: 96% approval on Rotten Tomatoes, 4 stars from Ebert.com, won 7 out of 10 Oscars

Red October: 88% approval on Rotten Tomatoes, 3.5 stars from Ebert, won 1 out of 3 Oscars

Not a bad film, but hardly "much better" by any of these accounts. I liked them both.

Date: 2023-07-15 06:05 am (UTC)
channelpenguin: (Default)
From: [personal profile] channelpenguin
I thought it might have been obvious that by "much better" I meant "in my opinion". :-)

Date: 2023-07-15 12:02 pm (UTC)
calimac: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calimac
No, it wasn't obvious, because you were trying to explain their appearance or nonappearance in articles which were not written by you and therefore not subject to the judgment of your opinion.

I guess you meant it as a joke, but I've seen enough really bad arguments in my time to be insensitized to jokes disguised as bad arguments.

Date: 2023-07-15 12:11 pm (UTC)
channelpenguin: (Default)
From: [personal profile] channelpenguin
Yup, it was meant as a joke.

I thought it would be funny to invite the assumption that the researchers share my opinions.

I don't know that you can actually sensibly have any case for or against, "is this good or bad?" when it comes to art of any sort, it's all just our opinion and what we personally like. But that's just my opinion of course :-).

2 - "crab" sticks

Date: 2023-07-15 06:27 pm (UTC)
agoodwinsmith: (Default)
From: [personal profile] agoodwinsmith
I am always fascinated and horrified by how processed food is made.

The machinery is fascinating and ingenious, and the goo is *so* too goo; and it also always surprises me the little parts of the process that are still best done by a human.

And: ew. ;)

Re: 2 - "crab" sticks

Date: 2023-07-19 08:42 pm (UTC)
anef: (Default)
From: [personal profile] anef
While I "knew" that crab sticks were processed fish, I hadn't appreciated quite *how* processed...they're not something I buy as such, but I do buy food with crabsticks in it. I'll have to think about that. Probably not for very long.

September 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 1213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 12th, 2025 03:37 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios