Date: 2021-10-24 05:30 pm (UTC)
bugshaw: (Default)
From: [personal profile] bugshaw
Thanks for the prop master interview, my low budget film group found it really useful.

Date: 2021-10-25 12:39 am (UTC)
dewline: Text - "On the DEWLine" (Default)
From: [personal profile] dewline
2. Well, that's not good at all.

3. Appalling. Not an appointment to be tolerated at all. Roeber should be fired for cause (or whatever the appropriate term is for the UK).

Royalty as a Tourist Attraction

Date: 2021-10-25 10:48 am (UTC)
danieldwilliam: (Default)
From: [personal profile] danieldwilliam
I'm not sure that the information in the tourist visitor numbers list quite supports the conclusion that Republic are inviting us to make.

I think it's a raw list of visitor numbers. IIRC 6 of the top ten attractions are free to the public and are very, very large public museums open every day of the year. That's not true of Buckingham Palace which isn't open all year round.

Royalty as a tourist draw is not the same thing as actually being able to go inside Buckingham Palace.

The Tower of London at 8th on the list and Hampton Court Palace which is 29th on the list surely draws a lot of tourist interest because of royal connections. (See also Holyrood Palace and Stirling Castle in Scotland.)

One could, if one were being silly or disingenous point at the Victoria and Albert Museum, the *Royal* Botanic Gardens, Westminster Abbey (royal burial and wedding venue,) the Old *Royal* Naval College etc to paint a very different picture of the impact of royalty on tourism in England.

October 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4
5 67891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 7th, 2025 06:22 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios