Date: 2021-08-03 01:18 pm (UTC)
dewline: Text - "On the DEWLine" (Default)
From: [personal profile] dewline
2. Why am I not surprised by this?

3. I have no doubt that this has been going on for as long as it's been needed as a survival tactic.

4. There is something heartening in this news.

6. Of course it backfired, and of course the specific US states whose governments made these decisions don't care that it backfired. Causing the pain was the whole point. They want a perpetually half-starved work force.

8. We've been working on building both bigger and better under Ottawa in order to make sure that what we dump into the Ottawa River is at least less harmful than it's been even if we can't dump less of it overall.

9. That's going to be an ongoing argument for the next year or ten, isn't it?

12. Canada doesn't even get to show up on the second version of the chart for 2020!

Date: 2021-08-03 02:28 pm (UTC)
danieldwilliam: (Default)
From: [personal profile] danieldwilliam
Our CEO made an interesting point to one of our engineers, who had been explaining to the CEO that he, (the engineer), didn't think he (the engineer) got anything extra that he needed to do his job out of being in the office and interacting in person with people, which was that his managers got something they needed to do *their* jobs out of seeing him in person.

My expectation is that organisations and people will sort themselves in to three groups over the next two years (1) always in - 90% in the office (2) Hybrid 3/2 or 2/3 and (3) always out 90% of the time out of the office. People and firms will naturally sort themselves in to the category that they think suits them. And over the five years following that many of them will decide they were wrong. Competative advantage probably lies with the always out group all other things being equal - renting offices is expensive.

Date: 2021-08-03 04:32 pm (UTC)
mountainkiss: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mountainkiss
Unless you think that collaboration is creative, in which case advantage might lie with one of the other groups. It’s probably more about “how done” than “which one”.

Date: 2021-08-12 05:23 pm (UTC)
jducoeur: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jducoeur

Agreed. I take note of the fact that my employers, who are absolutely obsessed with metrics, formally announced a month or two ago that the official policy going forward would be that hybrid is the norm, with fully-in-office and fully-remote available as needed. I'm pretty certain that they didn't make that decision without running the numbers carefully.

Date: 2021-08-03 04:56 pm (UTC)
naath: (Default)
From: [personal profile] naath
Desktop Linux is perfectly fine, I don't see what the problem is. (Ubuntu 20.04 on actually a laptop here, Dell XPS13). Work insisted on sending me a Windows laptop (exact same brand) which annoys me no end (not the spec, the design of the OS)

It's what you are used to.

Well, unless you wanna buy games, then you buy the OS on which the game you want runs. Which is why I have a PS3 and a Wii somewhere 'round here.

Date: 2021-08-03 10:50 pm (UTC)
symbioid: (Default)
From: [personal profile] symbioid
I find it interesting to see that he has a very similar take to how Windows approaches things... (Not nearly to the fanatical view MS does, but "Don't break userspace") really does fit the "MS programs will always run no matter how old" (even if that's not 100% true it's true enough).

I do like

Date: 2021-08-04 08:52 pm (UTC)
naath: (Default)
From: [personal profile] naath
yes, and I get that this situation creates a butt ton of work for some folks somewhere, which the community should fix to make life easier for devs, but I don't see that making the UX actually suck as a user. Maybe because I don't play games on my computer and nearly everything I use (for fun) is webby these days, so it's mostly the browser dev teams working hard, but they did the work, firefox on Ubuntu is just fine.

Date: 2021-08-04 07:44 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] anna_wing
Whether remote-working is useful or not depends entirely on the industry and the organisation - what it is, where it is, what it does, how it does it, what it values, what it needs its employees to value. Not to mention the relative leverage that individual employees and organisation as a whole have in respect to each other, which will also vary with time, place and demographics. With tech workers, I expect that the populations will sort themselves out eventually. People who prefer personal interactions with their work will gravitate to companies that share that preference. But basically, any organisation where the expected output depends on in-person collaboration and interaction will have found its capability degraded by remote working.

The cultural values map is interesting and a useful insight. Countries do in fact have cultures, if they're around for long enough. They're not static, or monolithic (one of the major arguments against the whole "cultural appropriation" issue) but they exist, and they affect public policy.

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 9th, 2026 11:14 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios