andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2021-03-23 12:45 pm (UTC)
cmcmck: (Default)
From: [personal profile] cmcmck
The sick kids is what? Five years overdue?

Adding Value to Bucky Barnes

Date: 2021-03-23 01:27 pm (UTC)
dewline: Logo: Open comic book with Cdn. Leaf Symbol (comic books)
From: [personal profile] dewline
Messrs. Brubaker and Epting clearly added significant value to Joe Simon and Jack Kirby's work by adding in the Winter Soldier elements to Barnes' story. All four creators deserve more than a "Special thanks to" credit in the end titles. I'd put those four names at the front end credits of F+WS right along with Stan Lee and Gene Colan for the original Falcon, Sam Wilson.
jack: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jack
And some of those things we could still benefit from doing for THIS pandemic :(

When the pandemic started, I almost felt like we dodged a bullet -- we could have found a completely-antibiotic-resistant bacterium, or an airborne disease with an incubation time of a month or two instead of two-three weeks. But instead we got something we could -- just about -- have handled if we didn't respond in the most stupid ways possible. But then we dived in front of the bullet :(
jack: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jack
I wonder if society would benefit from a minimum % which has to be assigned to the creator for a creative work. It could be complicated, but it would mean that companies had an obligation to track who the creator was, even if they only paid the minimum, which might make it easier to track and negotiate in future. And conversely, having a standardised process might make it easier to deal with orphaned work ("set this much aside").

I don't want copyright to be too complicated, but I also don't want a situation where "the person who created the story gets nothing, the big company with all the lawyers build a media empire out of it and get all the profit", whether that's because they worked for hire, or because the distributor just refused to pay them, or because the rights were whittled down with edge cases, or somehting else...

jack: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jack
Yeah, shared universe development is a quagmire for this sort of thing, that's one reason why publishers DO want work-for-hire for a lot of work. I imagine it would be even worse for TV shows where each episode often has one writer, but also a show-runner, and maybe uncredited suggestions, etc, etc.

But I also think, there could be reasonable guidelines for that sort of thing, like so much credit for writing a story, so much credit for writing an original story that's adapted into a new medium or has a sequel, so much for creating a character who is a major feature in a following story, etc. I know George Martin's shared-universe wildcards stories operate on that model: GRRM is the main editor and cat-herds everyone, and the ownership is a shared corporation everyone gets shares in in proportion to their contribution. And it mostly works, albeit most of the people involved probably want it to work.

And admittedly, there can be endless wrangling over was this character "featured" or "co-staring", etc, etc, and the publisher can still claim, "oh no, this isn't a sequel, it's a totally unrelated story that's just similar". So I'm not sure it could ever work. But if there are some minimum of "you get at least this much", it would mean that at least you don't get NOTHING when you write one of the comic books that turns into a highest-grosssing box office hit of all time. And even if there's fights about how to credit individual things, there's an obvious standard to aim for, "I wrote it, I should be credited", not a fight later.

September 2025

S M T W T F S
  12 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17181920
21222324252627
282930    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 18th, 2025 08:34 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios