Interesting Links for 29-01-2021
Jan. 29th, 2021 12:00 pm- Boosted by tech stocks, Norway wealth fund earns £90 billion in 2020
- (tags:Norway money )
- Are Psychiatric Conditions Spectra or Discrete?
- (tags:psychiatry psychology ontology statistics )
- The casting for the Sandman TV series is not what I expected, and that delights me
- https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1354806599714369544.html
(tags:sandman TV ) - The SNP taking steps in the right direction over transphobia. (Looking forward to their definition)
- (tags:snp LGBT transgender bigotry )
- The contents of Magna Carta - how much is still valid today?
- (tags:history law UK )
- Drone Swarms Are Getting Too Fast for Humans to Fight, U.S. General Warns
- (tags:USA drone military )
- How we we could have - and should have - avoided more than100,000 people dying from Covid in the UK
- (tags:pandemic death UK incompetence )
- UN court rules UK has no sovereignty over Chagos islands
- (tags:UK nationality )
- Nobody uses the word "technocrat" except when they're criticizing something.
- (tags:government organisation civilization rationality )
- GOP Congresswoman blamed deadly forest fire on Jewish space laser
- (tags:OhForFucksSake conspiracy Jews lasers wtf republicans )
- There were more Covid outbreaks in offices last year than in supermarkets, construction sites, warehouses, restaurants and cafes combined.
- (tags:pandemic office doom )
no subject
Date: 2021-01-29 03:12 pm (UTC)That's surely true of a lot of "-crat" words. Certainly "plutocrat" falls into the same category, for example. And "bureaucrat" isn't normally meant nicely. Still less "Eurocrat", which I read as mostly "bureaucrat in a bad way", with a side order of "PS the speaker is a pro-Brexit EU-hater".
Not all of them, of course. "democrat" (with small d, not identifying one side of the US political divide) is usually positively spun. But a lot.
"meritocrat" or "meritocracy" I've seen go both ways – some people use it to mean "we put the people in charge who can actually do those jobs best, what could be wrong with that?" and other people think it means "we gave the top jobs to our Oxford buddies on the assumption – or perhaps even the consciously fictitious pretext – that they must surely be the best".
no subject
Date: 2021-01-29 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-01-29 03:27 pm (UTC)https://twitter.com/Baddiel/status/1355066256181911553?s=20
no subject
Date: 2021-01-29 03:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-01-29 03:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2021-01-29 03:49 pm (UTC)On that basis, a lot of them look amazing, with a very close match to the original illustrations. The ones who don't look exactly like they do in the books (Lucien(ne) and Cain) look so unlike them that it must have been deliberate!
I particularly remember Gaiman's very strong hint that Cain ought to be played by Vincent Price (at one point Matthew offends Cain by saying they sound alike). Vincent Price is not available, so the alternatives are to either find the best Vincent Price imitation you can (a Vincent Cut-Price?) or else to head in a totally different direction. They've done the latter, and that seems sensible to me.
no subject
Date: 2021-01-29 03:52 pm (UTC)(Agreed on Cain)
no subject
Date: 2021-01-29 04:00 pm (UTC)I did watch Fingersmith fairly recently, which, hmm, fair enough.
no subject
Date: 2021-01-29 04:16 pm (UTC)And he's basically gravitas for hire, in a Jeremy Irons, Ian McKellen kind of way.
Big Fat Quiz of the Year use this for comedic effect. https://youtu.be/mlwW7f7T02g
no subject
Date: 2021-01-30 09:59 am (UTC)