andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2018-07-28 12:37 pm (UTC)
momentsmusicaux: (Default)
From: [personal profile] momentsmusicaux
> So there is no difference between what Michel Barnier says and what we would say individually, each and every member state.”

The UK government still doesn't get how the EU works...

Date: 2018-07-28 12:42 pm (UTC)
momentsmusicaux: (Default)
From: [personal profile] momentsmusicaux
I think it's a shame they're not going with Meryl Streep to play Leia, which was a rumour that did the rounds a while back.

Date: 2018-07-28 01:17 pm (UTC)
calimac: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calimac
I have been unable to figure out what the term "backstop" actually means in regard to the Irish border. I understand the Irish border dilemma, you don't have to explain that. What I want to know is what the term "backstop" refers to.

Date: 2018-07-28 02:57 pm (UTC)
calimac: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calimac
"A solution to the Irish border problem which will hold, even if no future trade deal is conducted, and is practical now."

That kind of explains why I didn't understand what the term meant, because there is no such thing.

Date: 2018-07-29 11:40 am (UTC)
jack: (Default)
From: [personal profile] jack
I mean, I thought the only plausible backstops were "NI stays in customs union" or "all UK stays in customs union", which may be politically untenable in the UK, but what the EU are insisting on.

So if, in theory, there's some non-disastrous deal which could be agreed, and could preserve the Irish non-hard border, but needs extra negotiating over the time of the transition, we can agree to negotiate that, with the fallback that if negotiations break down, the irish border isn't screwed over, even if the UK isn't happy. But in fact, the UK is insisting that there IS such a possible agreement when in fact, there basically isn't.

Date: 2018-07-29 11:37 pm (UTC)
skington: (fail)
From: [personal profile] skington
It's even worse than that. The only proper backstop is “The entire UK stays in the Customs Union and Single Market”. We've been having arguments about the customs union because that already gives Brexiters hives, but VAT collection, services, and other things that have so far been ignored mean that in practice Northern Ireland - and therefore the UK as a whole - need to be in the Single Market as well.

Date: 2018-07-28 07:39 pm (UTC)
heron61: (Default)
From: [personal profile] heron61
The "why communism is impossible" piece reminded me of this link I saw a while ago and which IIRC, you have have posted, about an attempt in Chile to create data drive communism - given that none of the lasting communist regimes have tried anything like that, it could work, and might work better than capitalism (which hasn't worked terribly well of late).

Date: 2018-07-28 08:37 pm (UTC)
heron61: (Default)
From: [personal profile] heron61
Sure, but I'm curious if communism + big data might do as well or better. It seems possible, but also impossible to determine w/o various sorts of mid scale tests (at least on the level of a small city).

Date: 2018-08-01 12:51 am (UTC)
birguslatro: Birgus Latro III icon (Default)
From: [personal profile] birguslatro
Stafford Beer's 'Brain of the Firm' (Second edition) explains in detail what happened in Chile. Its model was the human nervous system, roughly speaking, and contains lots of feedback loops. The hardware they had available was totally pathetic though.

Whether it could've worked better than capitalism would depend on how you define 'worked'. There was a 'strike' by truckers and the like, (meaning the self-employed and some small businesses), so it wasn't totally a communist state, otherwise they wouldn't have existed. And I'm unsure how the system would produce new types of businesses.

Canada

Date: 2018-07-28 08:59 pm (UTC)
agoodwinsmith: (Default)
From: [personal profile] agoodwinsmith
Good grief. I can't get the "Read More" button to open for me[1], but I am both angered and not surprised that we have people like that in our immigration services. Since when does racial background prove nationality? Duh? What are they going to do when faced with someone like me where you're spoiled for choice? Play paper scissor rocks with the various traditional locations of races and force the country that loses to take me?

Duh.

[1] - yes, okay, new browser, on my list, would you like to see my list? you can have my list if you like

Re: Canada

Date: 2018-07-30 06:00 pm (UTC)
agoodwinsmith: (Default)
From: [personal profile] agoodwinsmith
That assumes that the relative has been DNA-ed.

And: thank you. :)

Re: Canada

Date: 2018-07-30 08:23 pm (UTC)
agoodwinsmith: (Default)
From: [personal profile] agoodwinsmith
Here I am by way of Firefox, and I have been able to read the READ MORE - and it is even more duh than I thought: if the issue that the original country won't receive back its citizen, for whatever reason - what makes us think that having a "logical" reason to try another country will have any different outcome?

However, I am very perturbed that my government is using documents against someone which they won't allow that person's lawyer to see. That is not acceptable.

Date: 2018-07-29 08:31 pm (UTC)
darkoshi: (Default)
From: [personal profile] darkoshi
Now I want to read that Flash Gordon book.

Date: 2018-07-29 08:43 pm (UTC)
darkoshi: (Default)
From: [personal profile] darkoshi
Yes, and abebooks.com still has some copies that are cheaper than Amazon. Was just checking if I have an account with them already :)

Communism.

Date: 2018-07-30 08:58 pm (UTC)
agoodwinsmith: (Default)
From: [personal profile] agoodwinsmith
(Thanks for Firefox. You've enabled a monster, you know.)

I have always thought that the communist regimes we have had so far have tried to jump over the tough parts to get to the good parts - like trying to do a triple axel before learning how to tie your skates.

Marx was pretty clear that capitalism had to *fail* before communism would be viable. Capitalism may be evil, may operate poorly, may waste resources, blah de blah de blah, but until it becomes unusable, we can't move past it. The communist regimes we've seen have been top-down, imposed by strongman tactics, so essentially dictatorships with fancy frills.

I think some of the behaviours I see today in people 40 and younger are proto-communisms: not buying houses, not buying cars, developing informal networks for sharing resources. It's all very piecemeal and happening in fits and starts - but that's to be expected when there isn't a centralized authority dictating. The sharing collective approach is also going to look different when nested in non-TV-mediated[1] culture.

I suspect the proto-communism efforts are going to spring up and sink back as people's needs change - and as pressure from capitalism's death throes become more intense - it ain't gonna go down easy, and it's going to try to gobble or crush everything of value while it can. I see that impulse in the strongest capitalist adherents: modern-day capital C conservatives. Sometimes they will crush something, not because they want to have it, or that it has anything to do with them, or threatens them in any way - but because they *really* don't want other people to have good things.

[1] - back in the day, one would say "Western culture", or first world or nuclear family or ... but all of these have problems. TV, however, tends to have very fixed ideas about how families should work: bumbly pudgy father, acerbic svelte mother, older daughter, younger son, nice big house, one car for everyone including the dog, personal electronics out the wahzoo, holidays in mind-numbing resorts, blah blah blah. As you have probably guessed, I don't mean the family of TV programs, but the family of TV commercials.

Smartphones

Date: 2018-07-31 11:57 pm (UTC)
birguslatro: Birgus Latro III icon (Default)
From: [personal profile] birguslatro
The four smartphones I've owned have all been bought second-hand and thus not locked to any provider. (The latest was just for controlling my new robo-vacuum, but that hasn't proved a necessity yet.) And two of them were dual-Sim versions, on the off-chance that'd be useful. The idea being to use one with the best data plan, the other for the rest. Never did that, and there's now so many cheap plans available, it wouldn't be a useful cost-saving plan. That could still have other uses though.

Refurbished, unlocked named brands are an alternative way to get a good phone.

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
45 6 7 8 910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 9th, 2026 11:08 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios