andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker

Date: 2018-01-05 12:05 pm (UTC)
cmcmck: chiara (chiara)
From: [personal profile] cmcmck
Ben is a huge loss :o(

“By far, the main difference that I have noticed is that people who don’t know I am transgendered treat me with much more respect,” he wrote in Nature. “I can even complete a whole sentence without being interrupted by a man.”

The first bit is certainly true but the second bit less so, but then..............

Date: 2018-01-05 12:20 pm (UTC)
supergee: (rocket coyote)
From: [personal profile] supergee
My favorite thing about Nightflyers is that George has become enough of a bankable star that he doesn't have to whitewash his protagonist as he did in the movie.

Date: 2018-01-05 01:06 pm (UTC)
rmc28: Rachel in hockey gear on the frozen fen at Upware, near Cambridge (Default)
From: [personal profile] rmc28
I actually bought and read the Swedish death cleaning book over my Christmas break, and it's quite charming but I don't think had much new for me (but I've been struggling with decluttering for years)

Date: 2018-01-05 01:34 pm (UTC)
momentsmusicaux: (Default)
From: [personal profile] momentsmusicaux
> Choose life. Get a smartphone.

As soon as they make them in a size that actually fits in a pocket and isn't like a huge slab of cheese, sure.

Date: 2018-01-05 02:03 pm (UTC)
calimac: (Default)
From: [personal profile] calimac
The "would you be willing?" article is one of the rare pieces of psychology which actually confirms with how I think. Show that you care about what the customer's problem is, and you'll immediately de-escalate a tense situation. This is also the only advice piece I've ever seen to enunciate the basic truth that you should never begin a cold call with casual friendly chatter. That's for friends whom your interlocutor already knows. I've noticed that strangers who phone me for legitimate business reasons always begin by identifying themselves and why they're calling. I know that anyone who begins by not identifying themselves and saying "How are you today?" is up to no good.

On the other hand, the smartphone article is the absolute finest in complete asshatery. It is so offensive that it makes me, one of those late-middle-age doubters it addresses, want to NEVER get a smartphone just to show them, and to write a long litany of the things I hate and fear about the prospect of having one, most of them based on the inherent escalation of frustrations I already have with existing dumbphones and computers.

Regarding Smartphones ...

Date: 2018-01-06 01:06 am (UTC)
agoodwinsmith: (Default)
From: [personal profile] agoodwinsmith
.... I have one and use it stupidly.

I totally see how convenient it is to have access to everything in one device that goes everywhere with you. Boarding a plane, paying for just about everything, looking things up, ordering stuff, making appointments, keeping in touch with people.

But doing my banking on phone just gives me the willies so bad that I am just one moving mound of wobbly willies. Argh.

People con and scam and thieve and and and and ... currently they will have to do multiple things to get my everything - put it all on my smartphone and then it is just one wiffle and I'm cleaned out.

Also: Canada. Data plans are insane. Less like the cost of a coffee per month and more like opening a franchise location. Many many monies. I'd rather do old fogey stuff with my monies.

As a pristine ideal, though - yes.

rate-limited wonders

Date: 2018-01-07 02:09 pm (UTC)
mair_in_grenderich: (Default)
From: [personal profile] mair_in_grenderich
"You can get a smartphone that will allow you to live in the 21st century and engage with all its many wonders for £60 new"

As somebody with a < £60 smartphone, I am here to tell you that I can only engage without about three 21st century wonders, before I have to remove one app in order to install the next.

Date: 2018-01-07 09:12 pm (UTC)
movingfinger: (Default)
From: [personal profile] movingfinger
I was just put in mind again of the smartphone piece by circumstances, and I looked at it as I forwarded it to someone.

I don't think the author addresses one of the strongest reasons I have to using my smartphone to pay for parking (specifically): there is a surcharge. Your parking fee is marked up by a small amount each time you use the app our city has---to buy time, to add time, whatever. In my previous city they installed smart meters with credit card readers, and those too charged a *stinking* fee---in effect it was a $5 minimum for any parking meter use if you had a credit card. The local parking cards were not easy to buy (only one retailer had them and they weren't always in stock) and the card slots frequently didn't work.

If smartphone is going to be a default payment method, then users should not be charged different rates for cash, smartphone, or card-on-the-spot payments, and the app should not be provided by a for-profit corporation skimming the revenues.

Date: 2018-01-07 09:41 pm (UTC)
movingfinger: (Default)
From: [personal profile] movingfinger
That's wonderful!

[I get the message, universe, I should simply MOVE.]

Date: 2018-01-07 10:03 pm (UTC)
movingfinger: (Default)
From: [personal profile] movingfinger
Think of it as nobly setting an example for the colonies.

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 16th, 2025 02:37 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios