andrewducker: (Default)
[personal profile] andrewducker
Last week [livejournal.com profile] yonmei asked for people to describe their societies in 20 words or less.

I've failed miserably.

What started off as a list of attributes of my society turned into a desctiprion of an idealised society (as I realised I didn't really inhabit a society as such) and then into a kind of self-description. And I realised that my list of attributes didn't really work by itself. What it needed was connection between the differerent descriptions, to show how I fit together.

It's not done yet, and every time I look at it I move links about the place, change descriptive words, etc. As with any attempt to reduce a real life situation to a simple set of descriptors, it's personal, inadequate and facile. But I rather like it. Surprisingly easy to do too. If anyone's interested in knowing how it was done, leave a comment and I'll get around to writing it up.



The set of links that produced it is:

graph G {
Neophilic -- "Forward thinking";
"Forward thinking" -- "Long termist";
Neophilic -- "Information rich";
Subjective -- Intersubjective;
Intersubjective -- "Non-judgemental";
"Non-judgemental" -- Understanding ;
Subjective -- Empirical;
Experimental -- Empirical;
Empirical -- Logical;
Logical -- Abstract;
Logical -- Sceptical;
Logical -- Meritocratic;
"Long termist" -- Meritocratic;
Logical -- Argumentative;
Meritocratic -- Anarchic;
Abstract -- Focused;
Focussed -- "Absent minded";
Focussed -- "Single tasking";
"Absent minded" -- Oblivious;
Pragmatic -- Logical;
Pragmatic -- Experimental;
Supportive -- Pragmatic;
Supportive -- Understanding;
Neophilic -- Supportive;
Socialist -- Supportive;
Empirical -- Systemising;
Supportive -- Idealistic;
Idealistic -- Socialist;
Pragmatic -- Capitalist;
Anarchic -- Capitalist;
Experimental -- "Truth seeking";
"Information rich" -- "Understanding";
Insecure -- Controlling;
Controlling -- "Truth seeking";
Insecure -- "Non-judgemental";
Understanding -- "Truth seeking";
Agnostic -- Sceptical;
"Open minded" -- "Non-judgemental";
Agnostic -- "Open minded";
Abstract -- Systemising;
Sceptical -- Empirical;
"Open minded" -- Empirical;
Anarchic -- Hedonistic;
Controlling -- Socialist;
Subjective -- Sceptical;
"Open minded" -- Subjective;
Hedonistic -- Focused;
Focussed -- Argumentative;
Argumentative -- "Problem Oriented";
"Problem Oriented" -- Insecure;
}

Date: 2003-07-21 02:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kpollock.livejournal.com
Are the length of the links significant? {methinks, probably not)
Is the link count between concepts significant? (methinks must be, or it'd just be a list)

Date: 2003-07-21 03:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kpollock.livejournal.com
So the diagram tells us nothing more than the list of paired words (that is, not very much at all).

have you been up all night or something?

Maybe if things were bigger or bolder or differently coloured to indicate how their relative importance or whatever, it might be interesting as a diagram of you.

As it is, it just looks like inapproriate use of a diagram, probably cos you are using them in a spec [maybe even appropriately - I get specs full of spurious, non-informational UML all the time. that's what we get for training the business liason dudes in UML] and have got all carried-away in geekiness.

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
45 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 1415 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 2324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 24th, 2026 05:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios